From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
SureshSiddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Pallipadi,Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/6][RFC] sched: unify load_balance{,_newidle}()
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:16:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1261649811.4937.178.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261649351.12219.0.camel@marge.simson.net>
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 11:09 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 10:29 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Is that with just this patch applied or also with the next one? I
> > worried more about the next one.
>
> The next one is the troublemaker.
OK, let me re-read all that code with a fresh(er) mind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-24 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 18:50 [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move load balance code into sched_fair.c Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Remove the sched_class load_balance methods Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator usage from load_balance_fair Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator from move_one_task Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Remove from fwd decls Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched: Add a lock break for PREEMPT=y Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Ingo Molnar
2009-12-18 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 7/6][RFC] sched: unify load_balance{,_newidle}() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 4:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 10:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-24 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 17:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 8/6][RFC] sched: Remove load_balance_newidle() Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1261649811.4937.178.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox