public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Raistlin <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	michael trimarchi <michael@evidence.eu.com>,
	Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
	Johan Eker <johan.eker@ericsson.com>,
	"p.faure" <p.faure@akatech.ch>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>,
	Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com>,
	Bjoern Brandenburg <bbb@cs.unc.edu>,
	Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>,
	"giuseppe.lipari" <giuseppe.lipari@sssup.it>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 9/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: system wide bandwidth management
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:44:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262011449.7135.116.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255707940.6228.464.camel@Palantir>

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:45 +0200, Raistlin wrote:
> This commit adds the capability of controlling the maximum, system wide,
> CPU bandwidth that is devoted to SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.
> 
> This is done by means of two files:
>  - /proc/sys/kernel/sched_deadline_runtime_us,
>  - /proc/sys/kernel/sched_deadline_period_us.
> The ratio runtime/period is the total bandwidth all the SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
> can use in the system as a whole.
> Trying to create tasks in such a way that they exceed this limitation will
> fail, as soon as the bandwidth cap would be overcome.
> 
> Default value is _zero_ bandwidth available, thus write some numbers in those
> files before trying to start some SCHED_DEADLINE task. Setting runtime > period
> is allowed (i.e., more than 100% bandwidth available for -deadline tasks),
> since it makes more than sense in SMP systems.

Right, so the current rt bandwidth controls go up to 100%, where 100% is
root_domain wide. That is, the bandwidth usage scale is irrespective of
the number of cpus.

If that was the best choice could of course be argued, but since we have
that, it would be strange to add another set of controls which do not
conform.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-28 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-16 15:35 [RFC 0/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE (new version of SCHED_EDF) Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:38 ` [RFC 1/12][PATCH] Extended scheduling parameters structure added Raistlin
2009-12-29 12:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 10:36     ` Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:40 ` [RFC 0/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: core of the scheduling class Raistlin
2009-12-29 12:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 10:40     ` Dario Faggioli
2009-12-29 12:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 10:42     ` Raistlin
2009-12-29 14:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-29 14:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-29 14:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 16:32     ` Dario Faggioli
2010-01-13 16:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-29 14:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 10:46     ` Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:41 ` [RFC 0/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: fork and terminate task logic Raistlin
2009-12-29 15:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 11:11     ` Raistlin
2010-01-13 16:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 16:28         ` Dario Faggioli
2010-01-13 21:30         ` Fabio Checconi
2009-10-16 15:41 ` [RFC 0/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: added sched_*_ex syscalls Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:42 ` [RFC 0/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: added sched-debug support Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:43 ` [RFC 6/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: added scheduling latency tracer Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:44 ` [RFC 7/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: signal delivery when overrunning Raistlin
2009-12-28 14:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13  9:30     ` Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:44 ` [RFC 8/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: wait next instance syscall added Raistlin
2009-12-28 14:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13  9:33     ` Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:45 ` [RFC 9/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: system wide bandwidth management Raistlin
2009-11-06 11:34   ` Dhaval Giani
2009-12-28 14:44   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-01-13  9:41     ` Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:46 ` [RFC 10/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: group bandwidth management code Raistlin
2009-12-28 14:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13  9:46     ` Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:47 ` [RFC 11/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: documentation Raistlin
2009-10-16 15:48 ` [RFC 12/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: modified sched_*_ex API Raistlin
2009-12-28 15:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 10:27     ` Raistlin
2010-01-13 16:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-29 12:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 10:33     ` Raistlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1262011449.7135.116.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bbb@cs.unc.edu \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabio@gandalf.sssup.it \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=giuseppe.lipari@sssup.it \
    --cc=henrik@austad.us \
    --cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@evidence.eu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sven@thebigcorporation.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox