From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
roland@redhat.com, dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression: crash from 'ls /sys/modules/wl1251_spi/notes'
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:34:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262450062.2741.4.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2375c9f90912311908r667966e1m919430c40cd9c571@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 11:08 +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> This patch looks fine for me, except that I don't think it's necessary
> to introduce an inline function for that...
Actually, I really think we do. The whole reason we got into this mess
in the first place is that it wasn't obvious from the code that if we
altered the loadability of sections, there were a ton of dependent
places we also had to update. Putting all that knowledge into a single
inline makes the same mistake impossible to make because there's now
only one place to go to adjust the loadability of sections, and it
automatically takes care of all the dependencies.
> Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-02 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-30 11:41 regression: crash from 'ls /sys/modules/wl1251_spi/notes' Kalle Valo
2009-12-30 15:49 ` James Bottomley
2009-12-30 17:20 ` Kalle Valo
2009-12-31 21:15 ` Helge Deller
2010-01-06 1:15 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-01 3:08 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-02 16:34 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2010-01-04 18:23 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262450062.2741.4.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox