From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 31/36] sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:28:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264055303-15123-32-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264055303-15123-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
use radix_tree irq_desc_tree instead of irq_desc_ptrs.
-v2: according to Eric and cyrill to use radix_tree_lookup_slot and radix_tree_replace_slot
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
kernel/irq/handle.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 266f798..76d5a67 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
#include <trace/events/irq.h>
#include "internals.h"
@@ -127,7 +128,26 @@ static void init_one_irq_desc(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int node)
*/
DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
-static struct irq_desc **irq_desc_ptrs __read_mostly;
+static RADIX_TREE(irq_desc_tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+static void set_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ radix_tree_insert(&irq_desc_tree, irq, desc);
+}
+
+struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ return radix_tree_lookup(&irq_desc_tree, irq);
+}
+
+void replace_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ void **ptr;
+
+ ptr = radix_tree_lookup_slot(&irq_desc_tree, irq);
+ if (ptr)
+ radix_tree_replace_slot(ptr, desc);
+}
static struct irq_desc irq_desc_legacy[NR_IRQS_LEGACY] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
[0 ... NR_IRQS_LEGACY-1] = {
@@ -159,9 +179,6 @@ int __init early_irq_init(void)
legacy_count = ARRAY_SIZE(irq_desc_legacy);
node = first_online_node;
- /* allocate irq_desc_ptrs array based on nr_irqs */
- irq_desc_ptrs = kcalloc(nr_irqs, sizeof(void *), GFP_NOWAIT);
-
/* allocate based on nr_cpu_ids */
kstat_irqs_legacy = kzalloc_node(NR_IRQS_LEGACY * nr_cpu_ids *
sizeof(int), GFP_NOWAIT, node);
@@ -175,28 +192,12 @@ int __init early_irq_init(void)
lockdep_set_class(&desc[i].lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
alloc_desc_masks(&desc[i], node, true);
init_desc_masks(&desc[i]);
- irq_desc_ptrs[i] = desc + i;
+ set_irq_desc(i, &desc[i]);
}
- for (i = legacy_count; i < nr_irqs; i++)
- irq_desc_ptrs[i] = NULL;
-
return arch_early_irq_init();
}
-struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
-{
- if (irq_desc_ptrs && irq < nr_irqs)
- return irq_desc_ptrs[irq];
-
- return NULL;
-}
-
-void replace_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
-{
- irq_desc_ptrs[irq] = desc;
-}
-
struct irq_desc * __ref irq_to_desc_alloc_node(unsigned int irq, int node)
{
struct irq_desc *desc;
@@ -208,14 +209,14 @@ struct irq_desc * __ref irq_to_desc_alloc_node(unsigned int irq, int node)
return NULL;
}
- desc = irq_desc_ptrs[irq];
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
if (desc)
return desc;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
/* We have to check it to avoid races with another CPU */
- desc = irq_desc_ptrs[irq];
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
if (desc)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -228,7 +229,7 @@ struct irq_desc * __ref irq_to_desc_alloc_node(unsigned int irq, int node)
}
init_one_irq_desc(irq, desc, node);
- irq_desc_ptrs[irq] = desc;
+ set_irq_desc(irq, desc);
out_unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 6:27 [PATCH -v4 0/36] x86: not use bootmem for x86 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 01/36] x86: move range related operation to one file Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 02/36] x86: check range in update range Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 20:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-21 21:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 21:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 03/36] x86/pci: use u64 instead of size_t in amd_bus.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 04/36] x86/pci: add cap_resource Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 15:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-21 20:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 05/36] x86/pci: enable pci root res read out for 32bit too Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 15:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-21 20:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 06/36] x86: call early_res_to_bootmem one time Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 07/36] x86: introduce max_early_res and early_res_count Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 08/36] x86: dynamic increase early_res array size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 09/36] x86: print bootmem free before pci_iommu_alloc and free_all_bootmem -v2 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 10/36] x86: make early_node_mem get mem > 4g if possible Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 11/36] x86: only call dma32_reserve_bootmem 64bit !CONFIG_NUMA Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:27 ` [PATCH 12/36] x86: make 64 bit use early_res instead of bootmem before slab Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 13/36] sparsemem: put usemap for one node together Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 14/36] sparsemem: put mem map " Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 15/36] x86: change range end to start+size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 16/36] x86: move bios page reserve early to head32/64.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 17/36] x86: seperate early_res related code from e820.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 18/36] x86: add find_early_area_size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 19/36] x86: move back find_e820_area to e820.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 20/36] early_res: enhance check_and_double_early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 21/36] x86: make 32bit support NO_BOOTMEM Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 22/36] move round_up/down to kernel.h Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 20:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-21 23:14 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 23/36] x86: add find_fw_memmap_area Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 24/36] core: move early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 25/36] x86: print out for RAM buffer Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 26/36] x86: remove bios data range from e820 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 27/36] x86/pci: add mmconf range into e820 for when it is from MSR with amd faml0h Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 28/36] irq: remove not need bootmem code Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 29/36] radix: move radix init early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 30/36] sparseirq: change irq_desc_ptrs to static Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 32/36] x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 33/36] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 34/36] x86: according to nr_cpu_ids to decide if need to leave logical flat Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 35/36] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu
2010-01-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 36/36] x86: use num_processors for possible cpus Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264055303-15123-32-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox