From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
To: Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto@gmail.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"Sascha linux-arm" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: mc13783: consider Power Gates as digital regulators.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:56:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264082195.2396.137.camel@odin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263901734.6669.28.camel@realization>
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 12:48 +0100, Alberto Panizzo wrote:
> GPO regulators are digital outputs that can be enabled or disabled by a
> dedicated bit in mc13783 POWERMISC register.
> In this family can be count in also Power Gates (PWGT1 and 2): enabled by
> a dedicated pin a Power Gate is an hardware driven supply where the output
> (PWGTnDRV) follow this law:
>
> Bit PWGTxSPIEN | Pin PWGTxEN | PWGTxDRV | Read Back
> 0 = default | | | PWGTxSPIEN
> ---------------+-------------+----------+------------
> 1 | x | Low | 0
> 0 | 0 | High | 1
> 0 | 1 | Low | 0
>
> As read back value of control bit reflects the PWGTxDRV state (not the
> control value previously written) and mc13783 POWERMISC register contain
> only regulator related bits, a dedicated function to manage these bits is
> created here with the aim of tracing the real value of PWGTxSPIEN bits
> and reproduce it on next writes.
>
> All POWERMISC users _must_ use the new function to not accidentally
> disable Power Gates supplies.
>
> v2 changes:
> -Better utilization of abstraction layers.
> -Voltage query support. GPO's and PWGTxDRV are fixed voltage regulator
> with voltage value of 3.1V and 5.5V respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto@gmail.com>
Applied.
Thanks
Liam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 11:48 [PATCH v2] regulator: mc13783: consider Power Gates as digital regulators Alberto Panizzo
2010-01-19 13:23 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-21 13:56 ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264082195.2396.137.camel@odin \
--to=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maramaopercheseimorto@gmail.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox