From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: <mingo@elte.hu>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] x86, smp: Convert msr-smp.c to an smp library
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:41:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264092093-13739-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264092093-13739-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Put all smp-related helpers into lib/smp.c to use for the rest of the
kernel.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c | 204 ------------------------------------------------
arch/x86/lib/smp.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/smp.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
index cffd754..48a5ced 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ $(obj)/inat.o: $(obj)/inat-tables.c
clean-files := inat-tables.c
-obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += msr-smp.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += smp.o
lib-y := delay.o
lib-y += thunk_$(BITS).o
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a6b1b86..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,204 +0,0 @@
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/preempt.h>
-#include <linux/smp.h>
-#include <asm/msr.h>
-
-static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
- struct msr *reg;
- int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-
- if (rv->msrs)
- reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
- else
- reg = &rv->reg;
-
- rdmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
- struct msr *reg;
- int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-
- if (rv->msrs)
- reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
- else
- reg = &rv->reg;
-
- wrmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.reg.l;
- *h = rv.reg.h;
-
- return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.reg.l = l;
- rv.reg.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
-
-static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
- struct msr *msrs,
- void (*msr_func) (void *info))
-{
- struct msr_info rv;
- int this_cpu;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msrs = msrs;
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
-
- this_cpu = get_cpu();
-
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
- msr_func(&rv);
-
- smp_call_function_many(mask, msr_func, &rv, 1);
- put_cpu();
-}
-
-/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
- *
- * @mask: which CPUs
- * @msr_no: which MSR
- * @msrs: array of MSR values
- *
- */
-void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
-{
- __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __rdmsr_on_cpu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
-
-/*
- * wrmsr on a bunch of CPUs
- *
- * @mask: which CPUs
- * @msr_no: which MSR
- * @msrs: array of MSR values
- *
- */
-void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
-{
- __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __wrmsr_on_cpu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
-
-/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
- may not actually exist. */
-static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->reg.l, &rv->reg.h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->reg.l, rv->reg.h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.reg.l;
- *h = rv.reg.h;
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.reg.l = l;
- rv.reg.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
-
-/*
- * These variants are significantly slower, but allows control over
- * the entire 32-bit GPR set.
- */
-static void __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = rdmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = wrmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_regs_info rv;
-
- rv.regs = regs;
- rv.err = -EIO;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_regs_info rv;
-
- rv.regs = regs;
- rv.err = -EIO;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/smp.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6b1b86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/smp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <asm/msr.h>
+
+static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+ struct msr *reg;
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (rv->msrs)
+ reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
+ else
+ reg = &rv->reg;
+
+ rdmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+ struct msr *reg;
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (rv->msrs)
+ reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
+ else
+ reg = &rv->reg;
+
+ wrmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.reg.l;
+ *h = rv.reg.h;
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.l = l;
+ rv.reg.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
+
+static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
+ struct msr *msrs,
+ void (*msr_func) (void *info))
+{
+ struct msr_info rv;
+ int this_cpu;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msrs = msrs;
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+
+ this_cpu = get_cpu();
+
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
+ msr_func(&rv);
+
+ smp_call_function_many(mask, msr_func, &rv, 1);
+ put_cpu();
+}
+
+/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ */
+void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __rdmsr_on_cpu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/*
+ * wrmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ */
+void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __wrmsr_on_cpu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
+ may not actually exist. */
+static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->reg.l, &rv->reg.h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->reg.l, rv->reg.h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.reg.l;
+ *h = rv.reg.h;
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.l = l;
+ rv.reg.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+
+/*
+ * These variants are significantly slower, but allows control over
+ * the entire 32-bit GPR set.
+ */
+static void __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = rdmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = wrmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_regs_info rv;
+
+ rv.regs = regs;
+ rv.err = -EIO;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_regs_info rv;
+
+ rv.regs = regs;
+ rv.err = -EIO;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
--
1.6.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 16:41 [PATCH -v2 0/7] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2010-01-21 18:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86, smp: Convert msr-smp.c to an smp library H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86, smp: Adjust native_wbinvd for smp_call_function-helpers Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 18:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86, smp: Add wbinvd_on_all_cpus helper Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] intel-agp: Switch to wbinvd_on_all_cpus Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86, cacheinfo: Fix disabling of L3 cache indices Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86, cacheinfo: Add cache index disable sysfs attrs only to L3 caches Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indexes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 17:57 ` [PATCH] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indices Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264092093-13739-2-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox