linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, mingo@elte.hu,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Dongdong Deng <Dongdong.Deng@windriver.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] softlockup: add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:25:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264631124-4837-2-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264631124-4837-1-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com>

When CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK is set, sched_clock() gets the
time from hardware such as the TSC on x86.  In this configuration kgdb
will report a softlock warning message on resuming or detaching from a
debug session.

Sequence of events in the problem case:

1) "cpu sched clock" and "hardware time" are at 100 sec prior
   to a call to kgdb_handle_exception()

2) Debugger waits in kgdb_handle_exception() for 80 sec and on exit
   the following is called ...  touch_softlockup_watchdog() -->
   __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = 0;

3) "cpu sched clock" = 100s (it was not updated, because the interrupt
   was disabled in kgdb) but the "hardware time" = 180 sec

4) The first timer interrupt after resuming from kgdb_handle_exception
   updates the watchdog from the "cpu sched clock"

update_process_times() { ...  run_local_timers() --> softlockup_tick()
--> check (touch_timestamp == 0) (it is "YES" here, we have set
"touch_timestamp = 0" at kgdb) --> __touch_softlockup_watchdog()
***(A)--> reset "touch_timestamp" to "get_timestamp()" (Here, the
"touch_timestamp" will still be set to 100s.)  ...

    scheduler_tick() ***(B)--> sched_clock_tick() (update "cpu sched
    clock" to "hardware time" = 180s) ...  }

5) The Second timer interrupt handler appears to have a large jump and
   trips the softlockup warning.

update_process_times() { ...  run_local_timers() --> softlockup_tick()
--> "cpu sched clock" - "touch_timestamp" = 180s-100s > 60s --> printk
"soft lockup error messages" ...  }

note: ***(A) reset "touch_timestamp" to "get_timestamp(this_cpu)"

Why is "touch_timestamp" 100 sec, instead of 180 sec?

When CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK is set, the call trace of
get_timestamp() is:

get_timestamp(this_cpu) -->cpu_clock(this_cpu)
-->sched_clock_cpu(this_cpu) -->__update_sched_clock(sched_clock_data,
now)

The __update_sched_clock() function uses the GTOD tick value to create
a window to normalize the "now" values.  So if "now" value is too big
for sched_clock_data, it will be ignored.

The fix is to invoke sched_clock_tick() to update "cpu sched clock" in
order to recover from this state.  This is done by introducing the
function touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(). This allows kgdb to request
that the sched clock is updated when the watchdog thread runs the
first time after a resume from kgdb.

[yong.zhang0@gmail.com: Use per cpu instead of an array]
Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <Dongdong.Deng@windriver.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: peterz@infradead.org
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
 kernel/kgdb.c         |    6 +++---
 kernel/softlockup.c   |   15 +++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 6f7bba9..8923215 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
 extern void softlockup_tick(void);
 extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
+extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void);
 extern void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void);
 extern int proc_dosoftlockup_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 				    void __user *buffer,
@@ -323,6 +324,9 @@ static inline void softlockup_tick(void)
 static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
 {
 }
+static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
+{
+}
 static inline void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
 {
 }
diff --git a/kernel/kgdb.c b/kernel/kgdb.c
index 2eb517e..87f2cc5 100644
--- a/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static void kgdb_wait(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	/* Signal the primary CPU that we are done: */
 	atomic_set(&cpu_in_kgdb[cpu], 0);
-	touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+	touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
 	clocksource_touch_watchdog();
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ acquirelock:
 	    (kgdb_info[cpu].task &&
 	     kgdb_info[cpu].task->pid != kgdb_sstep_pid) && --sstep_tries) {
 		atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
-		touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+		touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
 		clocksource_touch_watchdog();
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 
@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ kgdb_restore:
 	}
 	/* Free kgdb_active */
 	atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
-	touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+	touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
 	clocksource_touch_watchdog();
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
index d225790..0d4c789 100644
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(print_lock);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, softlockup_touch_ts); /* touch timestamp */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, softlockup_print_ts); /* print timestamp */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, softlockup_watchdog);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, softlock_touch_sync);
 
 static int __read_mostly did_panic;
 int __read_mostly softlockup_thresh = 60;
@@ -79,6 +80,12 @@ void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
 
+void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
+{
+	__raw_get_cpu_var(softlock_touch_sync) = true;
+	__raw_get_cpu_var(softlockup_touch_ts) = 0;
+}
+
 void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -118,6 +125,14 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
 	}
 
 	if (touch_ts == 0) {
+		if (unlikely(per_cpu(softlock_touch_sync, this_cpu))) {
+			/*
+			 * If the time stamp was touched atomically
+			 * make sure the scheduler tick is up to date.
+			 */
+			per_cpu(softlock_touch_sync, this_cpu) = false;
+			sched_clock_tick();
+		}
 		__touch_softlockup_watchdog();
 		return;
 	}
-- 
1.6.4.rc1


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-27 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-27 22:25 [PATCH 0/3] V2 kgdb regression fixes for 2.6.33 Jason Wessel
2010-01-27 22:25 ` Jason Wessel [this message]
2010-01-29  8:07   ` [PATCH 1/3] softlockup: add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume Ingo Molnar
2010-01-29 14:51     ` Jason Wessel
2010-02-01  5:53       ` Dongdong Deng
2010-02-01  6:05         ` Jason Wessel
2010-02-01  6:41           ` Dongdong Deng
2010-02-01  7:27   ` [tip:core/urgent] softlockup: Add " tip-bot for Jason Wessel
2010-01-27 22:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to use hw_breakpoint API Jason Wessel
2010-01-27 22:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: No mutex taken for kernel debugger Jason Wessel
2010-01-28 17:33   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-28 17:49     ` [PATCH 3/3] perf,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: No mutex taken for kerneldebugger Jason Wessel
2010-01-28 20:09       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-28 20:38         ` [PATCH 3/3] perf,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: No mutex taken forkerneldebugger Jason Wessel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1264631124-4837-2-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --to=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=Dongdong.Deng@windriver.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).