From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932158Ab0A2QvU (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:51:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752502Ab0A2QvT (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:51:19 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:42884 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750959Ab0A2QvT (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:51:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2 PATCH] remove member rt_se from struct rt_rq From: Peter Zijlstra To: Yong Zhang Cc: linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , rusty In-Reply-To: <2674af741001282256l3058d356p752b49c024c47e1c@mail.gmail.com> References: <2674af741001282256l3058d356p752b49c024c47e1c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:51:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1264783867.24455.11.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:56 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > member rt_se of struct rt_rq is a duplicate of tg->rt_se[cpu]. > So we can remove one of them. After checking CFS, I think > rt_rq->rt_se can be removed for some kinds of consistence. Looks good I think.