From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751332Ab0BKFbd (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:31:33 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:50020 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750783Ab0BKFbb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:31:31 -0500 Subject: Re: register long sp asm("r1") incorrect From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Pavel Machek Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kernel list In-Reply-To: <20100209152444.GA30176@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20100209152444.GA30176@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:31:13 +1100 Message-ID: <1265866273.16346.34.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:24 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > ...according to gcc docs, sp should be global, or placement in > register is not guaranteed (except at asm boundaries, but there are > none). Sorry I'm not sure I grok what you mean. Cheers, Ben.