Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft

Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-02-11T15:22:28Z

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:21:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:52 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > which suggests we should simply remove that cpu argument
>
> The below patch does so for all in-tree bits.
>
> Doing this patch reminded me of the mess that is
> hw_perf_group_sched_in(), so I'm going to try and fix that next.
>

Yes Peter, thanks! At least for me this patch makes code more
understandable :)

-- Cyrill