From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ma, Ling" <ling.ma@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
ego@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix SMT scheduler regression in find_busiest_queue()
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:11:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1266142318.5273.407.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100213203611.GJ5882@dirshya.in.ibm.com>
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 02:06 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > @@ -4119,12 +4119,23 @@ find_busiest_queue(struct sched_group *group, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
> > > > continue;
> > > >
> > > > rq = cpu_rq(i);
> > > > - wl = weighted_cpuload(i) * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
> > > > - wl /= power;
> > > > + wl = weighted_cpuload(i);
> > > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * When comparing with imbalance, use weighted_cpuload()
> > > > + * which is not scaled with the cpu power.
> > > > + */
> > > > if (capacity && rq->nr_running == 1 && wl > imbalance)
> > > > continue;
> > > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * For the load comparisons with the other cpu's, consider
> > > > + * the weighted_cpuload() scaled with the cpu power, so that
> > > > + * the load can be moved away from the cpu that is potentially
> > > > + * running at a lower capacity.
> > > > + */
> > > > + wl = (wl * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) / power;
> > > > +
> > > > if (wl > max_load) {
> > > > max_load = wl;
> > > > busiest = rq;
> > > >
> > > >
>
> In addition to the above fix, for sched_smt_powersavings to work, the
> group capacity of the core (mc level) should be made 2 in
> update_sg_lb_stats() by changing the DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST to
> DIV_RPUND_UP()
>
> sgs->group_capacity =
> DIV_ROUND_UP(group->cpu_power, SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
>
> Ideally we can change this to DIV_ROUND_UP and let SD_PREFER_SIBLING
> flag to force capacity to 1. Need to see if there are any side
> effects of setting SD_PREFER_SIBLING at SIBLING level sched domain
> based on sched_smt_powersavings flag.
OK, so while I think that Suresh' patch can make sense (haven't had time
to think it through), the above really sounds wrong. Things should not
rely on the cpu_power value like that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-14 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-13 1:14 [patch] sched: fix SMT scheduler regression in find_busiest_queue() Suresh Siddha
2010-02-13 1:31 ` change in sched cpu_power causing regressions with SCHED_MC Suresh Siddha
2010-02-13 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-13 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-13 18:37 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-13 18:49 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-13 18:39 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-19 2:16 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-19 12:32 ` Arun R Bharadwaj
2010-02-19 13:03 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-19 19:15 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-19 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-19 18:36 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-19 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-19 19:50 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-19 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-20 1:13 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-22 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-24 0:13 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-24 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-24 19:31 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-26 10:24 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix SCHED_MC regression caused by change in sched cpu_power tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-26 14:55 ` tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-19 19:52 ` change in sched cpu_power causing regressions with SCHED_MC Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-13 18:33 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-13 18:27 ` [patch] sched: fix SMT scheduler regression in find_busiest_queue() Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-13 18:39 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-13 18:56 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-13 20:25 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-13 20:36 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-14 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-02-15 12:35 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-15 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-16 15:59 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-16 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-16 18:25 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-16 18:46 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-02-16 18:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-15 22:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-16 14:16 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1266142318.5273.407.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ling.ma@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox