From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:38:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1266493115-28386-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266493115-28386-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Use of kmap_atomic disables preemption but if we run in
shadow-shadow mode the vmrun emulation executes kvm_set_cr3
which might sleep or fault. So use kmap instead for
nested_svm_map.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 52f78dd..041ef6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ static inline int nested_svm_intr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
return 0;
}
-static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa, enum km_type idx)
+static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa)
{
struct page *page;
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa, enum km_type idx)
if (is_error_page(page))
goto error;
- return kmap_atomic(page, idx);
+ return kmap(page);
error:
kvm_release_page_clean(page);
@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ error:
return NULL;
}
-static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
+static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr)
{
struct page *page;
@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
page = kmap_atomic_to_page(addr);
- kunmap_atomic(addr, idx);
+ kunmap(addr);
kvm_release_page_dirty(page);
}
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
if (!(svm->nested.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT)))
return false;
- msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+ msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm);
if (!msrpm)
goto out;
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
ret = msrpm[t1] & ((1 << param) << t0);
out:
- nested_svm_unmap(msrpm, KM_USER0);
+ nested_svm_unmap(msrpm);
return ret;
}
@@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
vmcb->control.exit_int_info,
vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err);
- nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, KM_USER0);
+ nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb);
if (!nested_vmcb)
return 1;
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
/* Exit nested SVM mode */
svm->nested.vmcb = 0;
- nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+ nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb);
kvm_mmu_reset_context(&svm->vcpu);
kvm_mmu_load(&svm->vcpu);
@@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
u32 *nested_msrpm;
int i;
- nested_msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+ nested_msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm);
if (!nested_msrpm)
return false;
@@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->vmcb->control.msrpm_base_pa = __pa(svm->nested.msrpm);
- nested_svm_unmap(nested_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+ nested_svm_unmap(nested_msrpm);
return true;
}
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
- nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+ nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax);
if (!nested_vmcb)
return false;
@@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nested_vmcb->control.event_inj;
svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = nested_vmcb->control.event_inj_err;
- nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+ nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb);
enable_gif(svm);
@@ -1884,12 +1884,12 @@ static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
- nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+ nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax);
if (!nested_vmcb)
return 1;
nested_svm_vmloadsave(nested_vmcb, svm->vmcb);
- nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+ nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb);
return 1;
}
@@ -1904,12 +1904,12 @@ static int vmsave_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
- nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+ nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax);
if (!nested_vmcb)
return 1;
nested_svm_vmloadsave(svm->vmcb, nested_vmcb);
- nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+ nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb);
return 1;
}
--
1.6.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-18 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 11:38 [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-02-18 13:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: SVM: Fix wrong interrupt injection in enable_irq_windows Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 13:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:24 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: SVM: Sync all control registers on nested vmexit Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: Annotate nested_svm_map with might_sleep() Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: SVM: Fix nested msr intercept handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: SVM: Don't sync nested cr8 to lapic and back Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: SVM: Activate nested state only when guest state is complete Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:30 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: SVM: Remove newlines from nested trace points Joerg Roedel
2010-02-18 14:33 ` [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup) Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 14:48 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 14:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-18 16:33 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1266493115-28386-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox