From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Ira W. Snyder" <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Enhanced reimplemention of the kfifo API request for merge
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:39:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1266572356.10556.13.camel@wall-e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265961158.32651.9.camel@wall-e>
Hi,
is there a change to get the new generic kfifo API merged into the
linux-next, mm- or the upcoming 2.6.34 tree?
All features and complains are implemented. I got a lot of commits and
positve feedback but no ack's.
So the question is should i continue to work?
If i get an okay for the merge, the next steps will be:
- add a short HOWTO file into the Documentation directory
- replace all kfifo_out_locked() into kfifo_out_spinlocked() and
replace all kfifo_in_locked() into kfifo_in_spinlocked()
- modify the drivers to use the type based FIFO
- maybe port drivers which use its own fifo implementation to the new
kfifo API
Stefani ;-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-19 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-12 7:52 [PATCH 0/4] enhanced reimplemention of the kfifo API Stefani Seibold
2010-02-12 7:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] fix kfifo miss use of nozami.c Stefani Seibold
2010-02-12 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] remove the old non generic API Stefani Seibold
2010-02-12 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] add the new generic kfifo API Stefani Seibold
2010-02-12 8:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] add example files to the kernel sample directory Stefani Seibold
2010-02-19 9:39 ` Stefani Seibold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1266572356.10556.13.camel@wall-e \
--to=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox