From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751824Ab0CBLcL (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:32:11 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:44713 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750833Ab0CBLcI (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 06:32:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [rfc/rft][patch] should use scheduler sync hint in tcp_prequeue()? From: Peter Zijlstra To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Mike Galbraith , netdev , LKML , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <1267529273.2964.111.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1267522901.25906.101.camel@marge.simson.net> <1267529273.2964.111.camel@edumazet-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:32:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1267529525.25158.40.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 12:27 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > My Q6600 has shared caches Isn't core2quad a dual die construct, having 2 cache domains?