From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756574Ab0CDXAZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:00:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30090 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756329Ab0CDXAY (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:00:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 From: Adam Jackson To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Matthew Garrett , Dave Airlie , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net In-Reply-To: <4B903273.90305@garzik.org> References: <20100304185002.GA23532@srcf.ucam.org> <20100304190450.GA23807@srcf.ucam.org> <4B900AB2.1020603@garzik.org> <1267741133.1316.9.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> <4B903273.90305@garzik.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AtN9CzPVB6xRUGkLaNqR" Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:59:59 -0500 Message-Id: <1267743599.1316.47.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-AtN9CzPVB6xRUGkLaNqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:21 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > # sed -i 's/\.*/& nouveau.modeset=3D0/g' /etc/grub.conf >=20 > Never tried this part. The bug I'm assuming you're referring to is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D519298 in which you merely remove the nouveau userspace component, and in which I can't tell if you built nouveau into the kernel or not, but I assume you didn't based on your previous post. The X server does only try the one driver before falling back to vesa, which is a bug in the fallback logic I suppose. I've (blindly) fixed that for F13 now. However, the log in that bug only shows you using the built-in autoconfig logic, and not an xorg.conf file. So, given you were talking about a kernel without nouveau, I am left to assume one of: - you didn't try writing an xorg.conf fragment - you did, and it didn't work anyway The latter case is entirely plausible, as nv is not the sort of driver that gets a lot of love, but I'm not aware of any open bugs about gf9800 in particular in nv. - ajax --=-AtN9CzPVB6xRUGkLaNqR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuQO24ACgkQW4otUKDs0NM5pwCcDz3//urOn94mPt5nFINAbZOA rm0AoJ/hfBLnds6D367aHzH71x+rlr3S =1l59 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AtN9CzPVB6xRUGkLaNqR--