public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Merge of the 'write_inode' branch from the VFS tree
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:02:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1267812155.5174.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100305154823.GV30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 15:48 +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Or I can do a new branch, put updated pair of patches there (hch has sent
> the updated variants my way) and ask you to rebuild NFS tree.  Which will
> also suck, since it adds PITA for you and you are completely innocent in
> that clusterfuck.
> 
> Suggestions?  I'd love to get out of that mess with minimal PITA for
> everyone involved and minimally messed tree...

Hi Al,

I'd be fine with rebuilding the NFS tree. I have all the patches which
depend on write_inode in their own separate branch anyway, so I'd only
have to rebase that branch and then merge it with the main NFS client
tree...

Cheers
  Trond

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-05 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-05 15:26 Merge of the 'write_inode' branch from the VFS tree Trond Myklebust
2010-03-05 15:48 ` Al Viro
2010-03-05 17:40   ` [git pull] vfs part 3 (write_inode mess) Al Viro
2010-03-08 20:22     ` Steve Dickson
2010-03-09  8:52       ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-10 23:07       ` Trond Myklebust
2010-03-05 18:02   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2010-03-05 18:29     ` Merge of the 'write_inode' branch from the VFS tree Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1267812155.5174.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox