From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756087Ab0CHXji (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:39:38 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1519 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755893Ab0CHXjh (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:39:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf.c: Use noinline_for_stack From: Joe Perches To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Nick Andrew , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Stephen Rothwell In-Reply-To: <1267929215.1937.18.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> References: <20100304143837.af39845d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1267911399.849.39.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <1267914654.849.81.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <1267918554.849.89.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <1267924214.1937.12.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <1267929215.1937.18.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:39:35 -0800 Message-ID: <1268091575.1925.61.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 18:33 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 18:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > A few noinlines might be appropriate. > Mark static functions with noinline_for_stack It's fine by me that the vsnprintf recursion and (pr|dev|netdev)_ text reduction patches didn't make .34. I'd like to know what you think necessary to get them into .35. Perhaps it'd be useful if they could go into -next as-is for a bit of wider testing. http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83940/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83724/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83726/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83725/