From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: eranian@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, robert.richter@amd.com, davem@davemloft.net,
perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, eranian@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix X86 bogus counts when multiplexing
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:32:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268296361.5279.901.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268288259-4011-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 22:17 -0800, eranian@google.com wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug in 2.6.33 X86 event scheduling whereby
> all counts are bogus as soon as events need to be multiplexed
> because the PMU is overcommitted.
>
> The code in hw_perf_enable() was causing multiplexed events
> to accumulate collected counts twice causing bogus results.
>
> This is demonstrated on AMD Barcelona with the example
> below. First run, no conflict, you obtain the actual counts.
> Second run, PMU overcommitted, multiplexing, all events are
> over-counted. Third run, patch applied, you obtain the correct
> count through scaling.
>
I'm a bit puzzled by this one, if we, during scheduling move an event
from idx 1 to idx 2, we need to stop it on 1 and start if on 2,
otherwise we do not properly transfer its count, right?
With the below patch it does no such thing.
I did fix some funnies I observed with hw_perf_enable() while doing the
PEBS stuff, and -tip does it wrong differently from what you illustrate,
so while there defenately is something to fix, I doubt the below is
correct.
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> --
> perf_event.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 97cddbf..ef5d63f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -818,8 +818,6 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
> match_prev_assignment(hwc, cpuc, i))
> continue;
>
> - x86_pmu_stop(event);
> -
> hwc->idx = -1;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 6:17 [PATCH] perf_events: fix X86 bogus counts when multiplexing eranian
2010-03-11 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-03-11 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-11 14:41 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Fix hw_perf_enable() event assignment tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268296361.5279.901.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox