From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759528Ab0CNQz5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:55:57 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:33745 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759508Ab0CNQzz (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:55:55 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=u-VO3dv88eYA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=cEzFX_PQ7OMZniYf3OAA:9 a=VoQrNfTcw6ZnWBMj67kF11Ktc7MA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.89.75 Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup From: Steven Rostedt To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang Cc: Li Zefan , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20100313053733.GD3704@hack> References: <2375c9f91003042014y17588865g8f9110e666ac2456@mail.gmail.com> <2375c9f91003042316g6e774d60n90dfc4784d3b66bf@mail.gmail.com> <1267801603.10871.1725.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100305171614.GC5244@nowhere> <4B94A816.4090608@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268061312.10871.1810.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B95AE4E.6060700@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268101394.10871.1861.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B95C2AF.7010508@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268446049.4471.787.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100313053733.GD3704@hack> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:55:51 -0400 Message-ID: <1268585751.13400.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 (2.28.2-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:37 +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > >Americo, > > > >I still do not know why the function graph tracer is making your system > >unusable. I'll look more into that when I get a chance. So far, I have > >not had any issues on any of my boxes. > > > > Oh, in fact, I just tried 2 x86_64 machines, both of them have this > problem. > > Sorry that I don't have much time to do bisect, the last kernel that > I tried is 2.6.32-rc6, it is bad too. I will try some older kernels > if I have time. It may be a config problem. I'll analyze your config again and see if I can find something with it. But this will need to wait till next week. Thanks, -- Steve