* [PATCH 0/2] mfd, dma: Add timb-dma driver
@ 2010-03-25 18:44 Richard Röjfors
2010-03-26 0:35 ` Dan Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Röjfors @ 2010-03-25 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Samuel Ortiz, Williams, Dan J
To follow are two patches.
Samuel and Dan, since the MFD patch relies on the DMA patch.
The MFD patch is against Samuels next tree, maybe it is easiest
if the DMA driver is merged via Samuels tree?
The first patch adds the timb-dma driver to the dma tree.
The second one adds a timb-dma platform device to all
configurations of the timberdale MFD driver.
--Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd, dma: Add timb-dma driver
2010-03-25 18:44 [PATCH 0/2] mfd, dma: Add timb-dma driver Richard Röjfors
@ 2010-03-26 0:35 ` Dan Williams
2010-03-26 10:16 ` Samuel Ortiz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2010-03-26 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Röjfors
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Samuel Ortiz, Linus Walleij
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Richard Röjfors
<richard.rojfors@pelagicore.com> wrote:
> To follow are two patches.
>
> Samuel and Dan, since the MFD patch relies on the DMA patch.
> The MFD patch is against Samuels next tree, maybe it is easiest
> if the DMA driver is merged via Samuels tree?
It depends on the mfd patch at runtime, but thankfully not at build
time. There are some other patches being floated by Linus to change
the device_terminate_all() and device_is_tx_complete() operations.
So, I want to take just the driver patch through the dma tree to make
sure everything stays in sync.
Thanks,
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd, dma: Add timb-dma driver
2010-03-26 0:35 ` Dan Williams
@ 2010-03-26 10:16 ` Samuel Ortiz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2010-03-26 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Williams
Cc: Richard Röjfors, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linus Walleij
Hi Dan,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:35:21PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Richard Röjfors
> <richard.rojfors@pelagicore.com> wrote:
> > To follow are two patches.
> >
> > Samuel and Dan, since the MFD patch relies on the DMA patch.
> > The MFD patch is against Samuels next tree, maybe it is easiest
> > if the DMA driver is merged via Samuels tree?
>
> It depends on the mfd patch at runtime, but thankfully not at build
> time. There are some other patches being floated by Linus to change
> the device_terminate_all() and device_is_tx_complete() operations.
> So, I want to take just the driver patch through the dma tree to make
> sure everything stays in sync.
Makes sense. I'll take the MFD patch, thanks for taking care of the dma one.
Cheers,
Samuel.
> Thanks,
> Dan
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-26 10:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-25 18:44 [PATCH 0/2] mfd, dma: Add timb-dma driver Richard Röjfors
2010-03-26 0:35 ` Dan Williams
2010-03-26 10:16 ` Samuel Ortiz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox