From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753947Ab0CZDHi (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:07:38 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:45447 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753848Ab0CZDHh (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:07:37 -0400 From: Ben Hutchings To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: airlied@linux.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <20100326104042T.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <1269401628.18314.264.camel@localhost> <20100326104042T.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pq7ZsQUAcaQgf46hCMOl" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:07:26 +0000 Message-ID: <1269572846.8653.39.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.185 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sis-agp: Remove SIS 760, handled by amd64-agp X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-pq7ZsQUAcaQgf46hCMOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:41 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:33:48 +0000 > Ben Hutchings wrote: >=20 > > SIS 760 is listed in the device tables for both amd64-agp and sis-agp. > > amd64-agp is apparently preferable since it has workarounds for some > > BIOS misconfigurations that sis-agp doesn't handle. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings > > --- > > drivers/char/agp/sis-agp.c | 8 -------- > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >=20 > Looks fine to me. Hopefully, amd64-agp can handle all SIS 760 systems. >=20 > Can we confirm that this can fix bugs reported in Debian's bug > tracking system (which you mentioned earlier)? [...] The bug involves amd64-agp screwing with a device that is already bound to sis-agp. This patch should be sufficient to work around that. But the second patch, to amd64-agp, should actually fix it. This is not confirmed but I can try to get the bug submitters to test it. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. --=-pq7ZsQUAcaQgf46hCMOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAS6wk6ue/yOyVhhEJAQIhWxAAwmis5bxmSEPgLGQaePu9/RdHce5wrFDd pcB/4FCYywbbvEyLwqdhd89tD6a1tM2JZU3TnDiE378xWh7vAVKpT44GfsgGZIeN Gs8FYahqHM6lj+RGh4tQqB6vW4BnJeN+nBjLNZeuaGSCSnD1tD8W+X5MXvv01aF5 8qfshGrrcHTCSTmHEsHBZXy9QlMba1P+WBvuPRKjHA/GmBTRth9Yn1BTPGoYkZz6 rwffRw5hEiVbLg0876Paisu1GbHPzXe9zRL4mRWcJaiOvkaB7JHLFPb1a8vBpQNt I79T6aJMXpO/1hc2qlss0KgDedQbcxjIOkB2vIfU5wabBNKUG5syIrQjx6KHBQfd GJYzD7yrSPs4zYgcR7VZM+Z4/KEZ3b+wnKTeVtndtncL9pXhjUo4o1Z3gF+Xc9/T ghMtXEgKuEASMpuc3cTGl3vYrSooZI5TOyxdLQonz7qQ+2LOBfDYAQ2I/myYEHua WG2bc1WyG0qYP1VMBJfvSsBOBz2bvZuVV62zHAHZxlLFhaEOMv85FTK7v3vqKU2M URVHbhIWvpUHS54AwLrgQXB8uYEI1r2qHCB2HbFsUm6MKsMDVpvoMA24UnQyiO7a wepxrBd1yGyskKNeEx5YnMyzLunGEVn6GZo7cDNcbjjspfqdAffcQsStcsKMaLpq bwuanRJ0dkc= =WufM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pq7ZsQUAcaQgf46hCMOl--