From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755252Ab0C1U4K (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:56:10 -0400
Received: from smtp1.rdslink.ro ([81.196.12.70]:46436 "EHLO smtp.rdslink.ro"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755216Ab0C1U4J (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:56:09 -0400
X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff-II-2.1-r3 (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/)
Subject: Re: Checkpatch.pl false positive? "ERROR: return is not a
 function, parentheses are not required"
From: Olimpiu Pascariu <olimpiu.pascariu@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, apw@canonical.com,
       akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwalker@fifo99.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1269806370.1500.55.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
References: <1269804493.7079.14.camel@tuxtm-linux>
	 <20100328200922.GB27351@core2>  <1269806370.1500.55.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ANSI_X3.4-1968"
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:56:04 +0300
Message-ID: <1269809764.6087.1.camel@tuxtm-linux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 12:59 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> I think this passes checkpatch without warning:

Yes, you are right.
Thank you.