From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf/core, x86: unify perfctr bitmasks
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269975840.5258.609.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330182906.GD5211@lenovo>
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 22:29 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:55:13PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> [...]
> > -static int p4_hw_config(struct perf_event_attr *attr, struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
> > +static int p4_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
> > {
> > int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> > u32 escr, cccr;
> > @@ -444,11 +431,29 @@ static int p4_hw_config(struct perf_even
> > */
> >
> > cccr = p4_default_cccr_conf(cpu);
> > - escr = p4_default_escr_conf(cpu, attr->exclude_kernel, attr->exclude_user);
> > - hwc->config = p4_config_pack_escr(escr) | p4_config_pack_cccr(cccr);
> > + escr = p4_default_escr_conf(cpu, event->attr.exclude_kernel,
> > + event->attr.exclude_user);
> > + event->hw.config = p4_config_pack_escr(escr) |
> > + p4_config_pack_cccr(cccr);
> >
> > if (p4_ht_active() && p4_ht_thread(cpu))
> > - hwc->config = p4_set_ht_bit(hwc->config);
> > + event->hw.config = p4_set_ht_bit(event->hw.config);
> > +
> > + if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_RAW)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We don't control raw events so it's up to the caller
> > + * to pass sane values (and we don't count the thread number
> > + * on HT machine but allow HT-compatible specifics to be
> > + * passed on)
> > + *
> > + * XXX: HT wide things should check perf_paranoid_cpu() &&
> > + * CAP_SYS_ADMIN
> > + */
> > + event->hw.config |= event->attr.config &
> > + (p4_config_pack_escr(P4_ESCR_MASK_HT) |
> > + p4_config_pack_cccr(P4_CCCR_MASK_HT));
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> [...]
>
> P4 events thread specific is a bit more messy in compare with
> architectural events. There are thread specific (TS) and thread
> independent (TI) events. The exact effect of mixing flags from
> what we call "ANY" bit is described in two matrix in SDM.
>
> So to make code simplier I chose to just bind events to a
> particular logical cpu, when event migrate to say a second cpu
> the bits just flipped in accordance on which cpu the event is
> going to run. Pretty simple. Even more -- if there was some
> RAW event which have set "ANY" bit -- they all will be just stripped
> and event get bound to a single cpu.
>
> I'll try to find out an easy way to satisfy this "ANY" bit request
> though it would require some time (perhaps today later or rather
> tomorrow).
Right, so don't worry about actively supporting ANY on regular events,
wider than logical cpu counting is a daft thing.
What would be nice to detect is if the raw event provided would be a TI
(ANY) event, in which case we should apply the extra paranoia.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-29 16:36 [PATCH 0/3] perf/core, x86: unify perfctr bitmasks Robert Richter
2010-03-29 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/core, x86: undo some some *_counter* -> *_event* renames Robert Richter
2010-04-02 19:09 ` [tip:perf/core] perf, x86: Undo " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-03-29 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf/core, x86: removing p6_pmu_raw_event() Robert Richter
2010-03-29 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/core, x86: implement ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL bit masks Robert Richter
2010-03-29 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-29 17:01 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-30 9:28 ` Robert Richter
2010-04-02 19:09 ` [tip:perf/core] perf, " tip-bot for Robert Richter
2010-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] perf/core, x86: unify perfctr bitmasks Stephane Eranian
2010-03-30 13:41 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-30 13:53 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-30 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-30 15:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-30 15:31 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-30 15:59 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-30 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-30 17:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-30 17:24 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-30 18:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-30 19:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-03-30 19:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-31 16:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-31 16:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-03-31 17:05 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-04-01 2:14 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-01 6:47 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-01 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-02 19:09 ` [tip:perf/core] perf, x86: Fix up the ANY flag stuff tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269975840.5258.609.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox