From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:50:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1270104623.7101.116.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB43CAC.3080102@zytor.com>
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:26 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 03:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Not by adding overhead to every single down_read()/down_write() just to
> > fix a once-off startup problem - that's taking laziness way too far.
> >
>
> How much overhead is this on non-x86 architectures (keep in mind x86
> doesn't use this?)
None on powerpc, we use atomic ops and don't disable IRQs.
BTW. The same problem used to happen with mutex debug. Was this ever
fixed ?
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-01 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 19:41 start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Rabin Vincent
2010-03-31 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 20:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 20:52 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 21:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 22:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-01 14:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-02 14:46 ` David Howells
2010-04-02 14:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-07 19:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-04-08 15:55 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-31 21:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 21:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-03-31 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:54 ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:30 ` Russell King
2010-03-31 22:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01 1:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01 6:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 3:33 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-01 6:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 16:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 11:06 ` David Howells
2010-04-01 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-01 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 6:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-03-31 22:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-01 15:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-31 21:05 ` Russell King
2010-03-31 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-31 22:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:58 ` David Howells
2010-04-01 9:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-01 11:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-04-01 10:50 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1270104623.7101.116.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).