From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:47:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271242058.32749.19.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271098032.4807.137.camel@twins>
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 20:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 14:44 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > I know you indicated this was fixed in mainline and I see that set of
> > commits objects, but I'm seeing the below spew from linux-next today.
> >
> > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> > tag: next-20100412
> > commit: bbeecf185fe464ccd7ee97ce6d3646ad686995b4
> >
> > [ 0.035602] ===================================================
> > [ 0.036003] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > [ 0.037006] ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 0.038004] include/linux/cgroup.h:533 invoked
> > rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> > [ 0.039003]
> > [ 0.039004] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [ 0.039004]
> > [ 0.040003]
> > [ 0.040004] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> > [ 0.041004] no locks held by swapper/0.
> > [ 0.042003]
> > [ 0.042004] stack backtrace:
> > [ 0.043005] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-next-20100412+ #65
> > [ 0.044003] Call Trace:
> > [ 0.045015] [<ffffffff8108584f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaf/0xc0
> > [ 0.046010] [<ffffffff81044812>] set_task_cpu+0x2d2/0x370
>
> Oh, right, I still have to sort that out.
>
> I need to figure out how all that scheduler and cgroup muck interact to
> fix this.
I think the below should cure this..
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 3acf694..2e06d87 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -323,6 +323,15 @@ static inline struct task_group *task_group(struct task_struct *p)
/* Change a task's cfs_rq and parent entity if it moves across CPUs/groups */
static inline void set_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
{
+ /*
+ * Strictly speaking this rcu_read_lock() is not needed since the
+ * task_group is tied to the cgroup, which in turn can never go away
+ * as long as there are tasks attached to it.
+ *
+ * However since task_group() uses task_subsys_state() which is an
+ * rcu_dereference() user, this quiets CONFIG_PROVE_RCU.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
p->se.cfs_rq = task_group(p)->cfs_rq[cpu];
p->se.parent = task_group(p)->se[cpu];
@@ -332,6 +341,7 @@ static inline void set_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
p->rt.rt_rq = task_group(p)->rt_rq[cpu];
p->rt.parent = task_group(p)->rt_se[cpu];
#endif
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
#else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-15 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 1:26 INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Miles Lane
2010-03-11 3:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-12 18:44 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-12 18:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-15 15:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-19 3:45 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-19 18:26 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-19 23:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 1:25 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20 3:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 7:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 8:23 ` [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-20 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 12:31 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20 13:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <j2ya44ae5cd1004200545q6be4ec82o18ae99d93e8c29c7@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-20 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 15:38 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-21 6:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-04-21 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-21 22:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 23:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-22 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-22 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 12:50 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-23 19:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 01/12] rcu: Fix RCU lockdep splat in set_task_cpu on fork path Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 02/12] rcu: fix RCU lockdep splat on freezer_fork path Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 03/12] rcu: leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 04/12] NFSv4: Fix the locking in nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 05/12] NFS: Fix RCU issues in the NFSv4 delegation code Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 06/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 07/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning in the reading of user keys Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 08/12] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in cgroup_path() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 09/12] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in alloc_css_id() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 10/12] sched: Fix an RCU warning in print_task() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 11/12] cgroup: Check task_lock in task_subsys_state() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43 ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 12/12] memcg: css_id() must be called under rcu_read_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 22:59 ` [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Miles Lane
2010-04-24 5:35 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25 2:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 2:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 7:45 ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-25 7:49 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 2:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 15:49 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25 20:20 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-26 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-26 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-27 4:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:58 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-27 23:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 23:42 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 23:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <p2ka44ae5cd1004281358n86ce29d2tbece16b2fb974dab@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-28 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-01 17:26 ` Miles Lane
2010-05-01 21:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-02 2:00 ` Miles Lane
2010-05-02 4:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 1:05 ` INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Li Zefan
2010-04-21 3:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271242058.32749.19.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox