public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"containers@lists.osdl.org" <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: Fix an RCU warning in print_task()
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:20:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271931604.1776.337.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BD01740.7050805@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:30 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> With CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y, a warning can be triggered:
> 
>   $ cat /proc/sched_debug
> 
> ...
> kernel/cgroup.c:1649 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> ...
> 
> Both cgroup_path() and task_group() should be called with either
> rcu_read_lock or cgroup_mutex held.

Well, that's not strictly true, but yes in this case it appears to be a
genuine race, since only tasklist_lock is held and that doesn't protect
us from the task changing groups (and thus the current group from going
away on us).

You can also pin a cgroup by holding whatever locks are held in the
->attach method. But the RCU annotation doesn't know (nor reasonably can
know about that).

> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_debug.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
> index 9cf1baf..87a330a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,9 @@ print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  	{
>  		char path[64];
>  
> +		rcu_read_lock();
>  		cgroup_path(task_group(p)->css.cgroup, path, sizeof(path));
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
>  		SEQ_printf(m, " %s", path);
>  	}
>  #endif




  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-22 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-22  9:29 [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in cgroup_path() Li Zefan
2010-04-22  9:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in alloc_css_id() Li Zefan
2010-04-22 19:55   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22  9:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched: Fix an RCU warning in print_task() Li Zefan
2010-04-22 10:20   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-22 21:12     ` Matt Helsley
2010-04-22 22:05       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22 19:56   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22  9:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] freezer cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in cgroup_freezing_or_frozen() Li Zefan
2010-04-22 12:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-22 19:59     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22 20:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-23  1:05         ` Li Zefan
2010-04-23  6:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-22  9:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] blk-cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in blkiocg_create() Li Zefan
2010-04-22 14:31   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-22 19:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-07  6:56     ` Li Zefan
2010-05-07  6:57       ` Jens Axboe
2010-05-07 14:55         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in cgroup_path() Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271931604.1776.337.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox