linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	oleg@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, sivanich@sgi.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	josh@freedesktop.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpu_stop: implement stop_cpu[s]()
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 10:43:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272962620.5605.127.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BDFC6C0.7020009@kernel.org>

On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 09:03 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 05/04/2010 08:36 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On 05/03/2010 03:26 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 18:09 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>> +static int cpu_stopper_thread(void *data)
> >>> +{
> >>> +       struct cpu_stopper *stopper = data; 
> >>
> >> BUG_ON(stopper != __get_cpu_var(cpu_stopper)); ?
> > 
> > Added.
> 
> Now that I think more about it, there's a subtle race condition with
> the above BUG_ON().  Stoppers are prepared by CPU_UP_PREPARE and
> started by CPU_ONLINE but brought down by CPU_DEAD.  IOW, they're
> allowed to run detached from their designated CPUs between CPU_DYING
> and CPU_DEAD (the reponsibility of guaranteeing target cpus's onliness
> is on the callers).  So, the above BUG_ON() might trigger spuriously
> if a cpu goes down after brought online before its cpu_stopper had a
> chance to pass through the BUG_ON() test.

Ah indeed. A well, drop it then, its not worth making a more complicated
test.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-04  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-22 16:09 [PATCHSET sched/core] cpu_stop: implement and use cpu_stop Tejun Heo
2010-04-22 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpu_stop: implement stop_cpu[s]() Tejun Heo
2010-05-03 13:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04  6:36     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-03 13:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04  6:36     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-04  7:03       ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-04  8:43         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-05-03 13:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04  6:40     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-04  6:55       ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-22 16:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] stop_machine: reimplement using cpu_stop Tejun Heo
2010-04-22 16:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] scheduler: replace migration_thread with cpu_stop Tejun Heo
2010-05-03 13:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04  7:17     ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 12:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-04 12:49         ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-22 16:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] scheduler: kill paranoia check in synchronize_sched_expedited() Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-04 13:47 [PATCHSET sched/core] cpu_stop: implement and use cpu_stop, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpu_stop: implement stop_cpu[s]() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1272962620.5605.127.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).