From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] param sysfs oops (simple, leaky) fix, bool arrays fix
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 11:49:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273049369.3702.127.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hmxwevlm4.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:44 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 05 May 2010 10:25:14 +0300,
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:03 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 May 2010 03:37:19 am Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:53 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:23:24 pm Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > > > > Rusty, correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like the above memleak was
> > > > > > introduced by e180a6b7759a99a28cbcce3547c4c80822cb6c2a, where you added
> > > > > > the kstrdup(). So you kinda fixed the sysfs case (it still memleaks
> > > > > > though), but at the cost of additional insmod/rmmod leak, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yep!
> > > >
> > > > Are you working/planning to work on fixing this regression?
> > >
> > > I'm still ambivalent on it; I have patches but it's a lot of churn for not
> > > much gain.
> > >
> > > To fix this, we need a way to lock parameters against changing by sysfs, and
> > > we need to use it everywhere. Past experience has demonstrated that this will
> > > never be maintained.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, the leak is trivial.
> >
> > Well, I am not very concerned with the "changing by sysfs" leak. This is
> > not a big deal, IMHO. I am concerned with the "rmmod" leak, which did
> > not exist before your patches, but exists now. People may do a lot of
> > insmod/rmmod, and on each rmmod they will loose this kstrdup-ed string.
>
> I don't think there are so many real cases that actually do leaking.
I am sorry, but let me disagree. Did you count these cases? Why are you
so sure?
We are one live case. We use drivers/usb/gadget/nokia.c. And this is
also used in production, in the Nokia N900 phone.
IOW, I officially confirm that we are affected by this regression.
And there are many other potential charp users in drivers/usb/gadget.
Take a look at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c:
static char *iManufacturer;
module_param(iManufacturer, charp, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(iManufacturer, "USB Manufacturer string");
static char *iProduct;
module_param(iProduct, charp, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(iProduct, "USB Product string");
static char *iSerialNumber;
module_param(iSerialNumber, charp, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(iSerialNumber, "SerialNumber string");
This file is included from many other files:
[dedekind@eru gadget]$ pwd
/home/dedekind/git/linux-2.6-param-fixes/drivers/usb/gadget
[dedekind@eru gadget]$ grep 'composite.c' *
audio.c:#include "composite.c"
cdc2.c:#include "composite.c"
composite.c: * composite.c - infrastructure for Composite USB Gadgets
ether.c:#include "composite.c"
mass_storage.c:#include "composite.c"
multi.c:#include "composite.c"
nokia.c:#include "composite.c"
serial.c:#include "composite.c"
zero.c:#include "composite.c"
They are potentially affected too.
> This is only for charp type parameters (not string), and no leak
> happens unless user gives the value explicitly via a module option.
We do use these options. Surely, if they exist, people probably use at
least some of them, right? Otherwise why would they exist?
And I officially confirm that we load/unload the g_nokia gadget
(corresponds to nokia.c) many times, and we are not very interested in
having (even though small) memory leak.
> Fixing in the way of the later upstream is a bit too intrusive as a
> stable patch. So, I'm also not sure whether we should take it,
> too...
To be frank I do not really understand what you mean.
Anyway, I just humbly suggest not to have the "no one uses that, let's
have a leak" attitude. I do understand that this is a 'it's a lot of
churn for not much gain'. However, I think the rmmod leak is large
enough issue.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-28 22:32 [PULL] param sysfs oops (simple, leaky) fix, bool arrays fix Rusty Russell
2010-04-27 10:31 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-04-27 10:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-04 2:23 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-04 18:07 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-05 5:33 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-05 7:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-05 7:44 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-05-05 8:49 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-05-05 9:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-05-06 6:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-05-06 2:28 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-22 16:50 ` Phil Carmody
2010-06-22 23:23 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273049369.3702.127.camel@localhost \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox