From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756209Ab0EFI5N (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 04:57:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:33965 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751549Ab0EFI5K (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 04:57:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mc13783-regulator: fix vaild voltage range checking for mc13783_fixed_regulator_set_voltage From: Liam Girdwood To: Axel Lin Cc: linux-kernel , Mark Brown , Sascha Hauer In-Reply-To: <1273116816.26133.1.camel@mola> References: <1273116816.26133.1.camel@mola> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 09:57:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1273136225.2992.21.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:33 +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > In the case of "min_uV == max_uV == mc13783_regulators[id].voltages[0]", > mc13783_fixed_regulator_set_voltage should return 0 instead of -EINVAL. > > This patch also adds a missing ">" character for MODULE_AUTHOR, a trivial fix. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > Cc: Mark Brown > Cc: Liam Girdwood > --- > drivers/regulator/mc13783-regulator.c | 6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Both patches look the same. Is there any reason for the resend ? Thanks Liam