linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, aris@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com,
	dzickus@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] [watchdog] resolve softlockup.c conflicts
Date: Fri,  7 May 2010 17:11:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273266711-18706-8-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273266711-18706-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>

My changes with the softlockup code uses an older version of softlockup.c.
A couple of commits have been committed that were not on the branch I am
using.  This patch resolves those conflicts.

Commit 8c2eb4 softlockup: Stop spurious softlockup messages due to overflow
       d6ad3e softlockup: Add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel warning on kgdb resume

Conflicts:

	include/linux/sched.h
	kernel/kgdb.c
	kernel/softlockup.c

Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
 kernel/kgdb.c         |    6 +++---
 kernel/watchdog.c     |   17 ++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e9c6c1d..720e7e9 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
 extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
 extern void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void);
+extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void);
 extern unsigned int  softlockup_panic;
 extern int softlockup_thresh;
 extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
@@ -322,6 +323,9 @@ static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
 static inline void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
 {
 }
+static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK
diff --git a/kernel/kgdb.c b/kernel/kgdb.c
index 2eb517e..87f2cc5 100644
--- a/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static void kgdb_wait(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	/* Signal the primary CPU that we are done: */
 	atomic_set(&cpu_in_kgdb[cpu], 0);
-	touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+	touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
 	clocksource_touch_watchdog();
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
@@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ acquirelock:
 	    (kgdb_info[cpu].task &&
 	     kgdb_info[cpu].task->pid != kgdb_sstep_pid) && --sstep_tries) {
 		atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
-		touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+		touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
 		clocksource_touch_watchdog();
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 
@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ kgdb_restore:
 	}
 	/* Free kgdb_active */
 	atomic_set(&kgdb_active, -1);
-	touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+	touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync();
 	clocksource_touch_watchdog();
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 03671b7..80a282c 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ int __read_mostly softlockup_thresh = 60;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, watchdog_touch_ts);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, softlockup_watchdog);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer, watchdog_hrtimer);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, softlockup_touch_sync);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, hard_watchdog_warn);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, soft_watchdog_warn);
 #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS_NMI
@@ -136,6 +137,12 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
 		per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, cpu) = 0;
 }
 
+void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
+{
+	__raw_get_cpu_var(softlockup_touch_sync) = true;
+	__raw_get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = 0;
+}
+
 void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
 {
 	touch_softlockup_watchdog();
@@ -161,7 +168,7 @@ static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts, int cpu)
 	unsigned long now = get_timestamp(cpu);
 
 	/* Warn about unreasonable delays: */
-	if (now > (touch_ts + softlockup_thresh))
+	if (time_after(now, touch_ts + softlockup_thresh))
 		return now - touch_ts;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -250,6 +257,14 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 	hrtimer_forward_now(hrtimer, ns_to_ktime(get_sample_period()));
 
 	if (touch_ts == 0) {
+		if (unlikely(per_cpu(softlockup_touch_sync, this_cpu))) {
+			/*
+			 * If the time stamp was touched atomically
+			 * make sure the scheduler tick is up to date.
+			 */
+			per_cpu(softlockup_touch_sync, this_cpu) = false;
+			sched_clock_tick();
+		}
 		__touch_watchdog();
 		return HRTIMER_RESTART;
 	}
-- 
1.7.0.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-07 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-07 21:11 [PATCH 0/8] lockup detector changes Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup Don Zickus
2010-05-12 19:55   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-13  6:51   ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] [nmi watchdog] touch_softlockup cleanups and softlockup_tick removal Don Zickus
2010-05-12 20:06   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 20:26     ` Don Zickus
2010-05-12 20:28       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 20:56         ` Don Zickus
2010-05-12 21:00           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 21:38             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-12 21:50               ` Don Zickus
2010-05-13 15:53                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-13 16:04                   ` Don Zickus
2010-05-13  6:52   ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Touch_softlockup " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] [watchdog] remove old softlockup code Don Zickus
2010-05-13  6:52   ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Remove " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] [watchdog] remove nmi_watchdog.c file Don Zickus
2010-05-13  6:52   ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Remove " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] [x86] watchdog: move trigger_all_cpu_backtrace to its own die_notifier Don Zickus
2010-05-13  6:53   ` [tip:perf/nmi] x86: Move " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] [x86] watchdog: cleanup hw_nmi.c cruft Don Zickus
2010-05-13  6:53   ` [tip:perf/nmi] x86: Cleanup " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] [watchdog] separate touch_nmi_watchdog code path from touch_watchdog Don Zickus
2010-05-13  6:53   ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Separate " tip-bot for Don Zickus
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-23 16:13 [PATCH 0/8] lockup detector changes Don Zickus
2010-04-23 16:13 ` [PATCH 7/8] [watchdog] resolve softlockup.c conflicts Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273266711-18706-8-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com \
    --to=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=aris@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).