From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752464Ab0ELFVG (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 01:21:06 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:50252 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751611Ab0ELFVE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 01:21:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/25] lmb: Introduce for_each_lmb() and new accessors, and use it From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linuxtronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, davem@davemloft.net, lethal@linux-sh.org In-Reply-To: References: <1273484339-28911-1-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org> <1273484339-28911-2-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org> <1273484339-28911-3-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org> <1273484339-28911-4-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:20:32 +1000 Message-ID: <1273641632.21352.107.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:39 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > +#define for_each_lmb(lmb_type, region) \ > > + for (reg = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \ > > + region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt); \ > > + region++) > > + > > Can you please make this: > > #define for_each_lmb(lmb_type, region, __iter) \ > for (__iter = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \ > region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt); \ > region++) > > so we do not have the iterator name hardcoded inside the macro body. As a matter of fact, we didn't, but I made a typo on the first one: - for (reg = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \ + for (region = lmb.lmb_type.regions; \ region < (lmb.lmb_type.regions + lmb.lmb_type.cnt); \ region++) I'll fix that in my series. Cheers, Ben.