From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753636Ab0ELOU6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 10:20:58 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:56830 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752260Ab0ELOU5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 10:20:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have sane default values for cpusets From: Peter Zijlstra To: Dhaval Giani Cc: James Kosin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lennart@poettering.net, jsafrane@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de In-Reply-To: References: <4BEAB6FC.8090105@intcomgrp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1273674048.1626.117.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 16:13 +0200, Dhaval Giani wrote: > What you are saying is that an application > programmer who wants to just use memory cgroups should also care about > cpusets and just about countless other cgroup subsystems that can > exist. That's exactly what he says if he mounts them together.