The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
	Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make sure timers have migrated before killing migration_thread
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:31:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274261515.5605.10423.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100519090557.GA15237@amitarora.in.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:35 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> Problem : In a stress test where some heavy tests were running along with
> regular CPU offlining and onlining, a hang was observed. The system seems to
> be hung at a point where migration_call() tries to kill the migration_thread
> of the dying CPU, which just got moved to the current CPU. This migration
> thread does not get a chance to run (and die) since rt_throttled is set to 1
> on current, and it doesn't get cleared as the hrtimer which is supposed to
> reset the rt bandwidth (sched_rt_period_timer) is tied to the CPU being
> offlined.
> 
> Solution : This patch pushes the killing of migration thread to "CPU_POST_DEAD"
> event. By then all the timers (including sched_rt_period_timer) should have got
> migrated (along with other callbacks).
> 
> Alternate Solution considered : Another option considered was to
> increase the priority of the hrtimer cpu offline notifier, such that it
> gets to run before scheduler's migration cpu offline notifier. In this
> way we are sure that the timers will get migrated before migration_call
> tries to kill migration_thread. But, this can have some non-obvious
> implications, suggested Srivatsa.
> 
> Testing : Without the patch the stress tests didn't last for even 12
> hours. And yes, the problem was reproducible. With the patch applied the
> tests ran successfully for more than 48 hours.
> 
> Thanks!
> --
> Regards,
> Amit Arora
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Amit Arora <aarora@in.ibm.com>
>  Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
> --
> diff -Nuarp linux-2.6.34.org/kernel/sched.c linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c
> --- linux-2.6.34.org/kernel/sched.c	2010-05-18 22:56:21.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c	2010-05-18 22:58:31.000000000 -0700
> @@ -5942,14 +5942,26 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
>  		cpu_rq(cpu)->migration_thread = NULL;
>  		break;
>  
> +	case CPU_POST_DEAD:
> +		/*
> +		  Bring the migration thread down in CPU_POST_DEAD event,
> +		  since the timers should have got migrated by now and thus
> +		  we should not see a deadlock between trying to kill the
> +		  migration thread and the sched_rt_period_timer.
> +		*/

Faulty comment style that, please use:

 /*
  * text
  *  goes
  *   here
  */

> +		cpuset_lock();
> +		rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> +		kthread_stop(rq->migration_thread);
> +		put_task_struct(rq->migration_thread);
> +		rq->migration_thread = NULL;
> +		cpuset_unlock();
> +		break;
> +

The other problem is more urgent though, CPU_POST_DEAD runs outside of
the hotplug lock and thus the above becomes a race where we could
possible kill off the migration thread of a newly brought up cpu:

 cpu0 - down 2
 cpu1 - up 2 (allocs a new migration thread, and leaks the old one)
 cpu0 - post_down 2 - frees the migration thread -- oops!



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-19  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-19  9:05 [PATCH] Make sure timers have migrated before killing migration_thread Amit K. Arora
2010-05-19  9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-05-19 12:13   ` [PATCH v2] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-20  7:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-23  9:07       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-23  9:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24  6:43       ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-25 20:19       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-26  6:43         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24  9:59   ` [PATCH] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-24 13:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24 15:16       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2010-05-24 15:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25 11:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25 12:10       ` Amit K. Arora
2010-05-25 13:23       ` [PATCH v3] " Amit K. Arora
2010-05-25 14:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25 16:27         ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31  7:18         ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Make sure timers have migrated before killing the migration_thread tip-bot for Amit K. Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1274261515.5605.10423.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox