From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent events
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:59:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1274799588.5882.1572.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100525073246.GA6085@liondog.tnic>
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 09:32 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:23:21PM +0200
>
> > Either we add some notifier thing, or we simply add an explicit call in
> > the init sequence after the perf_event subsystem is running. I would
> > suggest we start with some explicit call, and take it from there.
>
> Ok, this couldn't be more straightforward. So I looked at the init
> sequence we do when booting wrt to perf/ftrace initialization:
>
> start_kernel
> ...
> |-> sched_init
> |-> perf_event_init
> ...
> |-> ftrace_init
> rest_init
> kernel_init
> |-> do_pre_smp_initcalls
> |...
> |-> smp_int
> |-> do_basic_setup
> |-> do_initcalls
>
> and one of the convenient places after both perf is initialized and
> ftrace has enumerated the tracepoints is do_initcalls() (It cannot be an
> early_initcall since at that time we're not running SMP yet and we want
> the MCE event per cpu.)
>
> So I added a core_initcall that registers the mce perf event. This makes
> it more or less a persistent event without any changes to the perf_event
> subsystem. I guess this should work - at least it builds here, will give
> it a run later.
>
> As a further enhancement, the init-function should read out all the
> logged mce events which survived the warm reboot and those which happen
> between mce init and the actual event registration so that perf can
> postprocess those too at a more convenient time.
Right, so that looks good. Now the interesting part is twofold:
1) expose these perf_events to userspace, since they're now created
in kernel, there is no user-space access point to them. One way
way would be to extend the perf syscall to allow attaching to an
existing instance (but that would limit us to a single instance per
'attr'), or create some /debug or /sys iteration of all such events.
2) get these things a buffer, perf_events as created don't actually
have an output buffer, normally that is created at mmap() time, but
since you cannot mmap() a kernel side event, it doesn't get to have
a buffer. This could be done by extracting perf_mmap_data_alloc()
into a sensible interface.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-25 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-22 19:00 [RFC PATCH 0/2] perf: persistent events prototype Borislav Petkov
2010-05-22 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, mce: Make MCE tracepoint persistent event Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <1274554806-28216-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>
2010-05-23 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent events Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-23 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-23 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-23 18:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-23 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-25 7:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-25 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-05-28 14:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-28 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-28 15:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-28 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-03 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-03 17:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-06-03 21:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-14 19:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-14 21:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-06-14 21:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-15 1:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-06-15 10:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-15 13:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-06-17 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-17 14:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-06-17 15:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-17 16:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-06-17 17:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-23 20:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] perf: persistent events prototype Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-22 19:04 Borislav Petkov
2010-05-22 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent events Borislav Petkov
2010-05-22 19:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-25 3:11 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1274799588.5882.1572.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox