From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934155Ab0EZIrx (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 04:47:53 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:37145 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933954Ab0EZIrk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 04:47:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Kevin Hilman , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Linux PM , LKML , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Tony Lindgren , Paul Walmsley In-Reply-To: <201005250138.16293.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1274482015-30899-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <201005242049.18920.rjw@sisk.pl> <87wrusvrqe.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <201005250138.16293.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:47:35 +0200 Message-ID: <1274863655.5882.4875.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:38 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This of course will lead to a scattering of suspend blockers into any > > drivers/subsystems considered "useful", which by looking through current > > Android kernels is many of them. > > That depends on the maintainers of these subsystems, who still have the power > to reject requested changes. So as a scheduler maintainer I'm going to merge a patch that does a suspend_blocker when the runqueue's aren't empty... how about that?