Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-26T15:12:51Z

On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:11 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > Implementation-wise it probably ties into setpidle, its simply that a task
> > has a pair of idle values, a dynamic one and a base one, the dynamic one
> > being the base one but updatable temporarily by drivers.

> How does this address the loss of wakeup events while using suspend?
> (For example the 2 issues formulated by Alan Stern in [1])

By not suspending obviously.