From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757491Ab0E0JN0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 05:13:26 -0400 Received: from esgaroth.petrovitsch.at ([78.47.184.11]:4467 "EHLO esgaroth.petrovitsch.priv.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933166Ab0E0JNP (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 05:13:15 -0400 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 unknown-host o4R8HErQ018669 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Opportunistic suspend support. From: Bernd Petrovitsch To: James Bottomley Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Pavel Machek , Pekka Enberg , Arve Hj?nnev?g , Florian Mickler , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern , Dmitry Torokhov , Linux-pm mailing list , Kernel development list , Len Brown , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Cornelia Huck , Tejun Heo , Jesse Barnes , Nigel Cunningham , Ming Lei , Wu Fengguang , Maxim Levitsky , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Greg KH , tytso@mit.edu In-Reply-To: <1274898180.4467.925.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <1274863342.5882.4850.camel@twins> <20100526112303.3fef15a4@schatten.dmk.lab> <1274866402.5882.5051.camel@twins> <1274868384.5882.5169.camel@twins> <1274869262.5882.5222.camel@twins> <1274890736.4467.574.camel@mulgrave.site> <1274891308.1674.1766.camel@laptop> <20100526165919.GB2089@elf.ucw.cz> <1274893309.1674.1773.camel@laptop> <1274894685.4467.758.camel@mulgrave.site> <1274898180.4467.925.camel@mulgrave.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:17:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1274948234.14002.27.camel@thorin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: esgaroth.petrovitsch.priv.at; whitelist Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mit, 2010-05-26 at 13:23 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 19:51 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: [...] > > Darn, _we_ have to deal with that forever as it sets a crappy user > > space ABI in stone. > > I really don't see how it is ... the ABI comes with a switch that allows > it to be disabled, so only platforms wishing to use it have to support > it. Even on those platforms that do support it, we can translate most You completely missed the point: The crappy user interface - and interferences with pother subsystems - must be maintained for ages - and that is independent if one uses it or not. Even worse if it's not widely used. > of it into pm QoS stuff and if one day someone solves the rogue app > problem, we can migrate over. If it's so important for Android and no one else, Android can carry it out of tree. Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at LUGA : http://www.luga.at