From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932202Ab0E0PJ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 11:09:29 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:36830 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755512Ab0E0PJ1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 11:09:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alan Stern Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:09:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1274972956.27810.5161.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:06 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > Opportunistic suspends are okay. > > The proposed userspace API is too Android-specific. I would argue opportunistic suspends are not ok, and therefore the proposed API is utterly irrelevant.