Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

Felipe Balbi
2010-05-27T16:29:28Z

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:06:23PM +0200, ext Alan Stern wrote:
>If people don't mind, here is a greatly simplified summary of the
>comments and objections I have seen so far on this thread:
>
> The in-kernel suspend blocker implementation is okay, even
> beneficial.

I disagree here. I believe expressing that as QoS is much better. Let
the kernel decide which power state is better as long as I can say I
need 100us IRQ latency or 100ms wakeup latency.

--
balbi

DefectiveByDesign.org