Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-26T15:45:07Z

On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:40 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 17:15:47 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:11 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > > I'm not saying that your argument is not valid. But why don't you look
> > > at suspend blockers as a contract between userspace and kernelspace? An
> > > Opt-In to the current guarantees the kernel provides in the non-suspend
> > > case.
> >
> > That's backwards.
>
> I think that's the point of it.

Apparently, and you're not accepting that we're telling you we think its
a singularly bad idea. Alan seems to have the skill to clearly explain
why, I suggest you re-read his emails again.