From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759296Ab0E0ROF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:14:05 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:40436 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754600Ab0E0ROA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:14:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alan Stern Cc: Felipe Balbi , Thomas Gleixner , Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , "Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org" , LKML , Florian Mickler , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:13:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1274980420.27810.5557.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:04 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > Does this mean you believe "echo mem >/sys/power/state" is bad and > should be removed? Or "echo disk >/sys/power/state"? They pay no > attention to latencies or other requirements. Those are a whole different beast, those are basically a quick-off button like thing. Forced suspend is conceptually a very different beast from power-saving a running system.