From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932576Ab0E0RcZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:32:25 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:34711 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756757Ab0E0RcW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:32:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alan Stern Cc: Felipe Balbi , Thomas Gleixner , Arve =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , LKML , Florian Mickler , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:32:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1274981533.27810.5624.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:29 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > They may be different conceptually. Nevertheless, Android uses forced > suspend as a form of power saving. Until better mechanisms are in > place, it makes sense. So let them, doesn't mean we have to merge it. Or will you saw your foot off too if google were to promotes it?