From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932953Ab0E0RxO (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:53:14 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:42235 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759331Ab0E0RxM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:53:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alan Stern Cc: Matthew Garrett , Thomas Gleixner , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:52:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1274982779.27810.5708.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:44 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > You close your laptop's lid and throw the machine into a backpack. At > that time you want it to suspend even though it may not be idle. > > > We've been trying to tell you you don't need that. > > And I'm trying to tell you that you do. Shall we henceforth stop confusing forced suspend for laptops and powersaving a running system?