From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754873Ab0E2H7j (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2010 03:59:39 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:50182 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753818Ab0E2H7f (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2010 03:59:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=UIZgw4fiw7CDfTW7yvkOasquxiFEorg/IJD153hxqeHWjClZEXPLSg4sBvAD2Yp9wM 0guKW7K0Pk4K7Rx2LvnKxpXl/QflK3AGZxcRfV6HIO9zV1jRab6roAzgeaMDeeIjsWpr 0TW+tl0HE/F8IMv2WXpdeptfNNF19uHi3rjDg= Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/17] VFS: introduce helpers for the s_dirty flag From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: Al Viro , LKML , Jens Axboe , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Zippel , "Tigran A. Aivazian" , Chris Mason , Boaz Harrosh , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , OGAWA Hirofumi , David Woodhouse , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Evgeniy Dushistov In-Reply-To: <20100528132318.0783675a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1274795352-3551-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <1274795352-3551-2-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <20100528132318.0783675a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 10:59:28 +0300 Message-Id: <1275119968.2668.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > +static inline void mark_sb_dirty(struct super_block *sb) > > +{ > > + sb->s_dirt = 1; > > +} > > +static inline void mark_sb_clean(struct super_block *sb) > > +{ > > + sb->s_dirt = 0; > > +} > > +static inline int is_sb_dirty(struct super_block *sb) > > +{ > > + return sb->s_dirt; > > +} > > A more conventional and superior naming scheme is > subsystemid_specific_function_identifier(). eg, bio_add_page() instead > of add_page_to_bio(). > > So these want to be sb_mark_dirty(), etc. > > Being very old code written by very yound people, the VFS kinda ignores > that convention, but it doesn't hurt to use it for new code. > > Feel free to ignore me if that's too much of a PITA ;) Sure I'll re-name them, thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)