From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: commit e9e9250b: sync wakeup bustage when waker is an RT task
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:56:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275306978.27810.22357.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273994510.7873.10.camel@marge.simson.net>
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 09:21 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> sched: RT waker sync wakeup bugfix
>
> An RT waker's weight is not on the runqueue, but we try to subrtact it anyway
> in the sync wakeup case, sending this_load negative. This leads to affine
> wakeup failure in cases where it should succeed. This was found while testing
> an PREEMPT_RT kernel with lmbench's lat_udp. In a PREEMPT_RT kernel, softirq
> threads act as a ~proxy for the !RT buddy. Approximate !PREEMPT_RT sync wakeup
> behavior by looking at the buddy instead, and subtracting the maximum task weight
> that will not send this_load negative.
Does the below work?
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 4 ++--
kernel/sched_fair.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1877,8 +1877,8 @@ static void dec_nr_running(struct rq *rq
static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p)
{
if (task_has_rt_policy(p)) {
- p->se.load.weight = prio_to_weight[0] * 2;
- p->se.load.inv_weight = prio_to_wmult[0] >> 1;
+ p->se.load.weight = 0;
+ p->se.load.inv_weight = WMULT_CONST;
return;
}
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1220,12 +1220,26 @@ static inline unsigned long effective_lo
#endif
+static unsigned long cpu_power(int cpu)
+{
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
+ struct sched_group *sg;
+
+ sd = rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(cpu_rq(cpu)->sd);
+ if (!sd)
+ return 1024;
+ sg = sd->groups;
+ if (!sg)
+ return 1024;
+
+ return sg->cpu_power;
+}
+
static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
{
unsigned long this_load, load;
int idx, this_cpu, prev_cpu;
unsigned long tl_per_task;
- unsigned int imbalance;
struct task_group *tg;
unsigned long weight;
int balanced;
@@ -1252,8 +1266,6 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_doma
tg = task_group(p);
weight = p->se.load.weight;
- imbalance = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
-
/*
* In low-load situations, where prev_cpu is idle and this_cpu is idle
* due to the sync cause above having dropped this_load to 0, we'll
@@ -1263,9 +1275,21 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_doma
* Otherwise check if either cpus are near enough in load to allow this
* task to be woken on this_cpu.
*/
- balanced = !this_load ||
- 100*(this_load + effective_load(tg, this_cpu, weight, weight)) <=
- imbalance*(load + effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, weight));
+ if (this_load) {
+ unsigned long this_eff_load, prev_eff_load;
+
+ this_eff_load = 100;
+ this_eff_load *= cpu_power(prev_cpu);
+ this_eff_load *= this_load +
+ effective_load(tg, this_cpu, weight, weight);
+
+ prev_eff_load = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
+ prev_eff_load *= cpu_power(this_cpu);
+ prev_eff_load *= load + effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, weight);
+
+ balanced = this_eff_load <= prev_eff_load;
+ } else
+ balanced = true;
/*
* If the currently running task will sleep within
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-31 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-15 11:57 commit e9e9250b: sync wakeup bustage when waker is an RT task Mike Galbraith
2010-05-15 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-15 17:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-15 17:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-16 7:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-17 4:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-17 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-17 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-17 9:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-31 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-05-31 13:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-05-31 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 18:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-01 6:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-06-01 9:12 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix wake_affine() vs RT tasks tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275306978.27810.22357.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox