linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM MSM updates for 2.6.35-rc1
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:56:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275515777.27006.48.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006021430100.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > I got a bit frustrated with ten different ARM pulls per day at one point.
> 
> In other words - when I do a "git pull", I really want to feel like there 
> is some point to it. When I get ten different ARM maintainers asking me to 
> pull stuff that just looks like noise, I'm just not getting those warm and 
> fuzzies about them. 
> 
> I'm also getting the feeling that now that different arch sub-architecture 
> maintainers all try to get their stuff in through me, things have actually 
> gotten worse - there's even less feeling of "somebody is actually trying 
> to keep track of all this stuff".
> 
> I understand why rmk wasn't happy. I'm also not really happy. 

Should all us ARM sub-architecture maintainers get together and make a
jumbo pull request with everything merged together?

Like someone, not you or RMK, would take all the sub-architecture
requests and put them into a single pull request w/ lots of details as
to what it all is ..

I know that doesn't solve what you said in the original email, how we
develop. One thing to remember is that we have tons of ARM device to
manage, and lots of chip manufactures .. So ARM is pretty diverse. I'm
not saying we're all perfect however.

Daniel



  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-02 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-27 21:52 [GIT PULL] ARM MSM updates for 2.6.35-rc1 Daniel Walker
2010-06-02 20:50 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-02 21:27   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 21:39     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 21:56       ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-06-02 22:30     ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-02 23:27     ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-03  1:20       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03  3:44         ` Michael Ellerman
2010-06-03  4:26           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 16:11             ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04  5:34             ` Eric Miao
2010-06-03  4:45         ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03  5:36         ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-04  8:27         ` Vincent Sanders

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275515777.27006.48.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
    --to=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).