From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
584846@bugs.debian.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#584846: Detects only 64MB and fails to boot on Intel Green City board if e820 hooked by GRUB2
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:58:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276351120.14011.194.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100612060322.29053.94187.reportbug@feather>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2465 bytes --]
Josh Triplett reported this problem with memory sizing:
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 23:03 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: normal
>
> I managed to reproduce the problem using stock upstream kernels and
> defconfig, and with defconfig (and no initramfs) the kernel managed to
> use little enough memory that it booted successfully with <64MB of RAM.
>
> Investigating, I found that Linux decided not to use e820, and instead
> decided to use the older BIOS function 0x88, which cannot report more
> than 64MB of RAM.
>
> With some investigation and bisection, I managed to track the problem
> down to the following commit:
>
> commit c549e71d073a6e9a4847497344db28a784061455
> Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Date: Sat Mar 28 13:53:26 2009 -0700
>
> x86, setup: ACPI 3, BIOS workaround for E820-probing code
>
> Impact: ACPI 3 spec compliance, BIOS bug workaround
>
> The ACPI 3 spec added another field to the E820 buffer -- which is
> backwards incompatible, since it contains a validity bit.
> Furthermore, there has been at least one report of a BIOS which
> assumes that the buffer it is pointed at is the same buffer as for the
> previous E820 call. Therefore, read the data into a temporary buffer
> and copy the standard part of it if and only if the valid bit is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
>
>
> A kernel built from c549e71d073a6e9a4847497344db28a784061455 finds <64MB
> of RAM; a kernel built from c549e71d073a6e9a4847497344db28a784061455^
> successfully finds all 4GB of RAM.
>
> Also note that newer upstream kernels, including v2.6.35-rc3, fail as
> well. Since later kernels revert part of the above commit, the issue
> must lie with the parts of the commit not reverted.
>
> And, again, I can reproduce this using the stock upstream GRUB2 1.98
> release built from source, by booting it from a USB key, and then
> booting the disk MBR via:
>
> set root=(hd1)
> drivemap (hd1) (hd0)
> chainloader +1
> boot
>
>
> Nothing special about drivemap here; anything that uses grub's mmap
> module to reserve memory via e820 (GRUB_MACHINE_MEMORY_RESERVED) will
> cause grub to hook e820 and trigger this bug. However, in stock grub,
> only drivemap does this.
>
> - Josh Triplett
>
>
>
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-12 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100612060322.29053.94187.reportbug@feather>
2010-06-12 13:58 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-06-12 18:28 ` Bug#584846: Detects only 64MB and fails to boot on Intel Green City board if e820 hooked by GRUB2 H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-12 18:55 ` Josh Triplett
2010-06-12 20:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-12 21:45 ` Josh Triplett
[not found] ` <20100612222634.GA1785@feather>
2010-06-12 23:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-12 23:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-13 0:07 ` Josh Triplett
2010-06-13 0:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <20100622052236.GA9130@feather>
2010-06-22 6:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-22 16:07 ` Josh Triplett
2010-06-24 7:27 ` Josh Triplett
2010-06-24 14:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-06-24 19:01 ` Josh Triplett
2010-06-24 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276351120.14011.194.camel@localhost \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=584846@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox