linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tmpfs: Quick token library to allow scalable retrieval of tokens from token jar
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:24:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276565094.2385.128.camel@mudge.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100612082757.7238224f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew,

I have tweaked your patch a bit and put in your suggestion of
implementing a percpu_counter_compare (see below), which
allowed for accurate but fast comparison.  This
is just meant for discussion so I have not broken
it into two patches (the percpu_counter part and shmem part).

One thing still bothers me with this approach:
When we are doing a remount of tmpfs, we cannot lock the
percpu_counter.  So we cannot guarantee that it won't get updated
after we read it.  So we could overshoot 
the new quota after a remount, or missed accounting for the
pages being returned while we remount.  Is this tolerable?

My previous qtoken implementation uses a special value (-1) 
to denote that the per cpu cache is disabled and synchronized access
by the lock on the whole counter.  So I didn't have to worry
that my count was inaccurate. This facility to lock access and freeze
counter update is not available in current percpu_counter
implementation.

Tim


diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
index c88d67b..8a7d510 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter
*fbc);
 void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
 void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32
batch);
 s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
+int percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 rhs);
 
 static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64
amount)
 {
@@ -98,6 +99,16 @@ static inline void percpu_counter_set(struct
percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
 	fbc->count = amount;
 }
 
+static inline int percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc,
s64 rhs)
+{
+	if (fbc->count > rhs)
+		return 1;
+	else if (fbc->count < rhs)
+		return -1;
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+
 static inline void
 percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
index e164291..d01d69e 100644
--- a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 #include <linux/mempolicy.h>
+#include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
 
 /* inode in-kernel data */
 
@@ -23,7 +24,7 @@ struct shmem_inode_info {
 
 struct shmem_sb_info {
 	unsigned long max_blocks;   /* How many blocks are allowed */
-	unsigned long free_blocks;  /* How many are left for allocation */
+	struct percpu_counter free_blocks;  /* How many are left for
allocation */
 	unsigned long max_inodes;   /* How many inodes are allowed */
 	unsigned long free_inodes;  /* How many are left for allocation */
 	spinlock_t stat_lock;	    /* Serialize shmem_sb_info changes */
diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter.c b/lib/percpu_counter.c
index aeaa6d7..583841d 100644
--- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -137,6 +137,33 @@ static int __cpuinit
percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
+/* 
+ * Compare counter against given value. 
+ * Return 1 if greater, 0 if equal and -1 if less
+ */ 
+int percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 rhs)
+{
+	s64	count;
+
+	count = percpu_counter_read(fbc);
+	/* Check to see if approx count will be sufficient for comparison */
+        if (abs(count - rhs) >
(percpu_counter_batch*num_online_cpus())){
+		if (count > rhs)
+			return 1;
+		else
+			return -1;
+	}
+	/* Need to use more precise count */
+	count = percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
+	if (count > rhs)
+		return 1;
+	else if (count < rhs)
+		return -1;
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_compare);
+
 static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
 {
 	compute_batch_value();
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index eef4ebe..7cd4f24 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <linux/file.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 
 static struct vfsmount *shm_mnt;
@@ -233,8 +234,8 @@ static void shmem_free_blocks(struct inode *inode,
long pages)
 {
 	struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(inode->i_sb);
 	if (sbinfo->max_blocks) {
+		percpu_counter_add(&sbinfo->free_blocks, pages);
 		spin_lock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
-		sbinfo->free_blocks += pages;
 		inode->i_blocks -= pages*BLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
 		spin_unlock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
 	}
@@ -422,11 +423,11 @@ static swp_entry_t *shmem_swp_alloc(struct
shmem_inode_info *info, unsigned long
 		 */
 		if (sbinfo->max_blocks) {
 			spin_lock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
-			if (sbinfo->free_blocks <= 1) {
+			if (percpu_counter_compare(&sbinfo->free_blocks, 1) <= 0) {
 				spin_unlock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
 				return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
 			}
-			sbinfo->free_blocks--;
+			percpu_counter_dec(&sbinfo->free_blocks);
 			inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
 			spin_unlock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
 		}
@@ -1386,14 +1387,14 @@ repeat:
 		sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(inode->i_sb);
 		if (sbinfo->max_blocks) {
 			spin_lock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
-			if (sbinfo->free_blocks == 0 ||
+			if ((percpu_counter_compare(&sbinfo->free_blocks, 0) <= 0) ||
 			    shmem_acct_block(info->flags)) {
 				spin_unlock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
 				spin_unlock(&info->lock);
 				error = -ENOSPC;
 				goto failed;
 			}
-			sbinfo->free_blocks--;
+			percpu_counter_dec(&sbinfo->free_blocks);
 			inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
 			spin_unlock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
 		} else if (shmem_acct_block(info->flags)) {
@@ -1794,7 +1795,8 @@ static int shmem_statfs(struct dentry *dentry,
struct kstatfs *buf)
 	spin_lock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
 	if (sbinfo->max_blocks) {
 		buf->f_blocks = sbinfo->max_blocks;
-		buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree = sbinfo->free_blocks;
+		buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree =
+				percpu_counter_sum(&sbinfo->free_blocks);
 	}
 	if (sbinfo->max_inodes) {
 		buf->f_files = sbinfo->max_inodes;
@@ -2258,7 +2260,7 @@ static int shmem_remount_fs(struct super_block
*sb, int *flags, char *data)
 		return error;
 
 	spin_lock(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
-	blocks = sbinfo->max_blocks - sbinfo->free_blocks;
+	blocks = sbinfo->max_blocks -
percpu_counter_sum(&sbinfo->free_blocks);
 	inodes = sbinfo->max_inodes - sbinfo->free_inodes;
 	if (config.max_blocks < blocks)
 		goto out;
@@ -2277,7 +2279,7 @@ static int shmem_remount_fs(struct super_block
*sb, int *flags, char *data)
 
 	error = 0;
 	sbinfo->max_blocks  = config.max_blocks;
-	sbinfo->free_blocks = config.max_blocks - blocks;
+	percpu_counter_init(&sbinfo->free_blocks, config.max_blocks - blocks);
 	sbinfo->max_inodes  = config.max_inodes;
 	sbinfo->free_inodes = config.max_inodes - inodes;
 
@@ -2352,7 +2354,7 @@ int shmem_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void
*data, int silent)
 #endif
 
 	spin_lock_init(&sbinfo->stat_lock);
-	sbinfo->free_blocks = sbinfo->max_blocks;
+	percpu_counter_init(&sbinfo->free_blocks, sbinfo->max_blocks);
 	sbinfo->free_inodes = sbinfo->max_inodes;
 
 	sb->s_maxbytes = SHMEM_MAX_BYTES;



  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-15  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-26 19:32 [PATCH v2 1/2] tmpfs: Quick token library to allow scalable retrieval of tokens from token jar Tim Chen
2010-06-01 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-02  8:58   ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-09 22:36     ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-10 17:06       ` Tim Chen
2010-06-11 21:52         ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-11 22:06           ` Tim Chen
2010-06-11 22:26             ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-11 23:29               ` Tim Chen
2010-06-11 23:54                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-12  7:36                   ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-12 15:27                     ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-15  1:24                       ` Tim Chen [this message]
2010-06-02 17:32   ` Tim Chen
2010-06-09 22:41     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1276565094.2385.128.camel@mudge.jf.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).