From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] Unified NMI delayed call mechanism
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:12:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276866769.1875.14.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100618130921.GC9045@basil.fritz.box>
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 15:09 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > You generally want to pass more information along anyway, now your
> > callback function needs to go look for it. Much better to pass a
> > work_struct like thing around that is contained in the state it needs.
>
> But how would you allocate the work queue in an NMI?
>
> If it's only a single instance (like this bit) it can be always put
> into a per cpu variable.
Pre-allocate. For the perf-event stuff we use the perf_event allocated
at creation time. But yeah, per-cpu storage also works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-18 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-12 9:28 [RFC 1/3] Unified NMI delayed call mechanism Huang Ying
2010-06-12 9:28 ` [RFC 2/3] Use unified NMI delayed call mechanism in MCE handler Huang Ying
2010-06-12 9:28 ` [RFC 3/3] Use unified NMI delayed call mechanism in perf event NMI handler Huang Ying
2010-06-12 10:25 ` [RFC 1/3] Unified NMI delayed call mechanism Ingo Molnar
2010-06-13 1:54 ` Huang Ying
2010-06-14 3:45 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-06-14 13:54 ` Don Zickus
2010-06-14 14:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-14 15:12 ` Don Zickus
2010-06-18 10:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-18 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-18 11:34 ` huang ying
2010-06-18 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-18 13:40 ` huang ying
2010-06-18 14:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-18 15:16 ` huang ying
2010-06-18 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-19 1:51 ` huang ying
2010-06-19 8:02 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-19 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-19 14:07 ` huang ying
2010-06-19 14:24 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-18 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-18 12:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-18 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-18 13:09 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-18 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-06-18 13:23 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-18 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-18 14:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-19 14:17 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276866769.1875.14.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc="nvin hpa"@zytor.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox