From: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Li <lkml@chrisli.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.c:314
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:02:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1277928125.18854.0.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2B9DAC.1030806@intel.com>
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 20:40 +0100, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> From the dmesg:
> > IOMMU 0: reg_base_addr fe710000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
> > DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fe714000 flags: 0x0
> > IOMMU 1: reg_base_addr fe714000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
> > DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fe719000 flags: 0x0
> > IOMMU 2: reg_base_addr fe719000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
> > DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fe718000 flags: 0x1
> > IOMMU 3: reg_base_addr fe718000 ver 1:0 cap 900000c2f0462 ecap e01
>
> Where we expect bit 54 to be set for the DMA iommu, and it does not
> appear to show up.
So the BIOS is lying to us about which PCI devices are attached to which
IOMMU?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-28 23:50 BUG in drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v2.c:314 Chris Li
2010-06-29 0:45 ` Dan Williams
2010-06-29 7:17 ` Chris Li
2010-06-29 23:20 ` Chris Li
2010-06-29 23:57 ` Dan Williams
2010-06-30 1:07 ` Chris Li
2010-06-30 4:17 ` Dan Williams
2010-06-30 18:26 ` Chris Li
2010-06-30 18:43 ` Chris Li
2010-06-30 18:43 ` David Woodhouse
2010-06-30 19:40 ` Dan Williams
2010-06-30 20:02 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2010-06-30 21:44 ` Dan Williams
2010-06-30 21:59 ` Chris Li
2010-06-30 22:04 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-01 6:21 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-01 6:51 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-01 7:12 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-01 7:26 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-01 8:15 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-01 17:20 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-01 17:58 ` Chris Li
2010-07-02 19:00 ` Chris Li
2010-07-05 10:16 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-06 23:40 ` Chris Li
2010-07-07 0:51 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-07 0:51 ` Chris Li
2010-07-07 0:58 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-07 1:03 ` Chris Li
2010-07-07 3:22 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-07 3:40 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-07 17:47 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-07 18:07 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-07 21:56 ` Chris Li
2010-07-09 21:28 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-09 22:00 ` Chris Li
2010-07-10 0:09 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-15 5:41 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-16 21:29 ` Chris Li
2010-07-16 22:12 ` David Woodhouse
2010-07-16 22:40 ` Chris Li
2010-07-22 1:15 ` Dan Williams
2010-07-22 21:39 ` Chris Li
2010-07-22 22:00 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1277928125.18854.0.camel@localhost \
--to=david.woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).