From: Raistlin <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Harald Gustafsson <hgu1972@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Song Yuan <song.yuan@ericsson.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nicola Manica <nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it>,
Luca Abeni <lucabe72@email.it>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>,
Harald Gustafsson <harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com>,
Bjoern Brandenburg <bbb@email.unc.edu>,
bastoni@cs.unc.edu, Giuseppe Lipari <lipari@retis.sssup.it>
Subject: Re: periods and deadlines in SCHED_DEADLINE
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:52:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278798752.4918.24.camel@Palantir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin0sj6ONjNcwX6IJHSgi7gKnCzkvD_jaLyOFNjs@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1978 bytes --]
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 22:08 +0200, Harald Gustafsson wrote:
> > That is a very delicate point, the whole reason SCHED_FIFO and friends
> > suck so much is that they don't provide any kind of isolation, and thus,
> > as an Operating-System abstraction they're an utter failure.
> >
> > If you take out admission control you end up with a similar situation.
>
> OK, I see your point, and I also want to keep the isolation, its just
> that I thought that the complexity might be too large to be accepted
> by mainline. Let's work towards a solution with good admission
> control, i.e. having more complex admission control to handle this.
>
Indeed. I think things might be done step by step, relaxing the
constraints as long as we find better solutions.
> > Embedded people can of course easily hack in whatever they well fancy,
> > and adding the 'yes_I_really_want_this_anyway' flag or even taking out
> > admission control all together is something the GPL allows them to do.
>
> Not an option I would like to pursue, it should be possible to get a
> working solution without this.
>
Yeah, I see your point and agree with it. Btw, I think that, even in the
configuration described by Peter, if you --as an embedded system
engineer-- have the full control of your device/product, you can avoid
having any hard-rt task. Then, if you only have soft ones, you'll get
the benefit of having the possibility of setting D!=P without suffering
of any interference... Am I right?
I think this could be a viable solution, at least until we have
something better to relax assumptions on the schedulability test for
hard tasks, isn't it?
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy)
http://blog.linux.it/raistlin / raistlin@ekiga.net /
dario.faggioli@jabber.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-10 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-09 13:38 periods and deadlines in SCHED_DEADLINE Raistlin
2010-07-09 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09 14:51 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-07-09 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 9:01 ` Raistlin
2010-07-10 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 14:49 ` Raistlin
2010-07-11 6:42 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-08-03 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 3:52 ` Andrea Bastoni
2010-08-04 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 5:18 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-08-03 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 3:53 ` Andrea Bastoni
2010-08-04 5:02 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-07-10 7:08 ` Raistlin
2010-07-11 6:46 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-08-03 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-03 11:42 ` Gregory Haskins
2010-08-04 6:30 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-07-09 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 7:11 ` Luca Abeni
2010-07-10 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-11 6:12 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-07-09 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 9:14 ` Raistlin
2010-07-10 17:19 ` Harald Gustafsson
2010-07-10 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 20:08 ` Harald Gustafsson
2010-07-10 21:52 ` Raistlin [this message]
2010-07-11 5:41 ` Harald Gustafsson
2010-07-11 7:32 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-07-12 10:21 ` Harald Gustafsson
2010-08-04 5:55 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-08-02 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-04 4:44 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-07-09 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 7:50 ` Raistlin
2010-07-10 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-10 17:29 ` Harald Gustafsson
2010-07-11 6:15 ` Bjoern Brandenburg
2010-07-10 7:09 ` Luca Abeni
2010-07-10 9:20 ` Raistlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278798752.4918.24.camel@Palantir \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=bastoni@cs.unc.edu \
--cc=bbb@email.unc.edu \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=hgu1972@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lipari@retis.sssup.it \
--cc=lucabe72@email.it \
--cc=nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=song.yuan@ericsson.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox